The paper sent seismic shocks through both legal and economic circles, and goosed the #NeoBrandeisian movement (sneeringly dismissed as "#HipsterAntitrust"). This movement is a rebuke to #Reaganomics, with its celebration of #monopolies, #TrickleDown, #offshoring, corporate dark money, revolving-door #RegulatoryCapture, and companies that are simultaneously #TooBigToFail and #TooBigToJail.

3/

There are undoubtably some "#NeoBrandeisian" antitrust activists who feel that way, but it's a mistake to paint the whole movement with that brush.

For many trustbusters, the point of antitrust isn't increasing competition - it's *reducing corporate power*. Amazon has built the "planned economy" that capitalists claim to deplore, but this planned economy isn't run by democratically accountable government technocrats.

31/

You don't need newfangled #NeoBrandeisian antitrust to see why this is bad - even under "consumer welfare" antitrust, anything that will obviously make prices go up is prohibited (indeed, this is the *only* thing consumer welfare antitrust cares about).

How do we know that a Jetblue/Spirit merger is a price-increasing, illegal antitrust violation? *Spirit says so*.

9/