I think this question matters because it helps us see how history is not the same for everyone. Scientists saw it as progress, but maybe locals experienced fear, confusion, or damage. Thinking this way helps us understand different voices and the impact of big events. #Hist2110
#Hist2110
How did the experience of local New Mexicans near the Trinity site compare to the scientists' views at the time of the test?

#Hist2110

Post 5:
I do believe that that my question is meaningful because for studying the source because it encourages people to look back onto dates and look further into NM history.

Primary source I found: a 1945 photograph of scientists at the Trinity nuclear test site in New Mexico. This is part of the Los Alamos National Laboratory archives. #Hist2110
Link: https://nuclearactive.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Small_Boy_nuclear_test_1962-e1664465643952.jpeg

#Hist2110

Post 4:
Is the Primary source about the court case play an important part in trying to establish law and life into New Mexico?

#Hist2110

Post 3:
This is a link to the secondary source found about New Mexico history

Link: guides.ll.georgetown.edu/c.php?g=275873&p=8461738

Primary sources are things created during the time of an event, like letters, photos, or official documents. Secondary sources are written later and analyze or explain the event, like textbooks, articles, or documentaries. #Hist2110
Secondary source I found: an article from New Mexico Magazine titled “How the Manhattan Project Changed New Mexico.” It explains the history and impact of the nuclear age in the region. #Hist2110
Link: https://www.newmexico.org/nmmagazine/articles/post/manhattan-project/

#Hist2110

Post 2
primary source: is the transcript of the sentence in court March 16, 1847. In New Mexico.

#Hist2110 I believe my question is helpful to see what historical events are significant to each individual.