Great piece by the recently deceased #NoelIgnatiev, (thanks to #DavidRoediger):
"I find Douglass’s electoral efforts uninteresting, just as I find uninteresting today’s debates over whether socialists should take part in elections... He was flailing, and knew it.
"But a strong case can be made for Douglass when we shift our ground from his electoral to his non-electoral activities: what did he do when not electioneering?"
Frederick Douglass, John Brown, and the Virtues of Impracticality
In a lengthy review in the New Yorker of David W. Blights recent book, Frederick Douglass: Prophet of Freedom,1 Adam Gopnik calls Douglass the progenitor of the pragmatic-progressive strain in American thought that led to Martin Luther King and Barack Obama.2 Douglass is an attractive figure, and it is easy to understand why he fills the need of American mainstream thought for a Black political hero now that George Washington Carver (the one Black figure in the textbooks when I went to grade school) no longer serves. But the notion of pragmatic progressive suggests an alternative tradition, which we might call impractical revolutionary. Nat Turner, John Brown, and Malcolm X come to mind as exemplars.