@[email protected]First, no war is just.
It's always an attempt to dominate the enemy through violence.
And if you get attacked, you can only fight back or surrender. There is no alternative.
And in both cases, any "just war theory" is just a way to legitimize the aggressor.
On the other hand, fighting back is always legitimate as long as you are victim of an aggression. It might be pointless, if you die, but it's always legitimate.
Now the war we are fighting against
#BigTech is exactly the same war that the
#USA are fighting in
#Iran, in
#Gaza and even in
#Ucraine.
It's a war for resource control and geopolitical power.
Yes, the USA's elites are more brutal there (
#Trump even jokes about the people they kill "for fun") but people die of hunger and perfectly curable diseases here, in the third world and in the USA too, sacrified to the woreship of US capitalism.
So it is a war.
But it's not a
#ColdWar like the aftermath of WWII.
It's a war between the world richest and everybody else. They kill with different weapons according to the terrain, be it the
#CIE guns or whe drones in Iran. They do psyops wherever they are technically able to.
Once you realize you are under attack, once you realize who is attacking you, you face a choice: fight back or surrender.
Pretending it's not a war means surrending.
Is it "just" to fight back?
No.
Is it "just" to surrender?
No.
Still you have to pick an option.
Do you see any alternative?
@[email protected]