๐Ÿšง Extended Suspension of Asylum Law at the #EU's Eastern #Border

On May 21 in #Poland Sejm voted overwhelmingly (366 MPs in favor) to extend a controversial #AsylumLaw for an additional 60 days, preventing those entering via Belarus from seeking asylum.

Read on the context of the Polish asylum law & #MigrationPolicy: https://linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7333113117725323264/

#EUBorder #MigrationRoute #LegalProtection #HumanRights #BorderObserver

#asylumlaw #humanrights #eulaw #poland #migrationpolicy #ruleoflawโ€ฆ | Aleksandra Samonek

๐Ÿšง ๐˜Œ๐˜น๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜š๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ˆ๐˜ด๐˜บ๐˜ญ๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ ๐˜“๐˜ข๐˜ธ ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜Œ๐˜œโ€™๐˜ด ๐˜Œ๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฏ ๐˜‰๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ On 21 May 2025, the ๐—ฃ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ต ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ท๐—บ ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—น๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐—น๐˜† (366 MPs in favor) to ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฌ ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜†๐˜€ ๐—ฎ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜†๐—น๐˜‚๐—บ ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜„, which bars individuals entering Poland irregularly from Belarus from seeking asylum. This extension prolongs a legal regime that entered into force in March 2025, initially for 60 days only. Despite early reservations, President Andrzej Duda signed the law in March 2024, framing it as a necessary step to safeguard Polandโ€™s borders against โ€œhybrid threatsโ€ โ€” a position tacitly supported by the European Commission, which emphasized the need for temporary, proportionate, and well-defined measures amid geopolitical tensions. The lawโ€™s critics, including prominent human rights organizations and UNHCR Poland legal partners such as Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights, Fundacja Ocalenie | Ocalenie Foundation, Association for Legal Intervention, Instytut na Rzecz Paล„stwa Prawa, Nomada Association, and others, described the measure as ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐˜๐˜‚๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜€. Multiple critical legal opinions highlighted how the lawโ€™s sweeping generalizations about people on the move dangerously obscure the humanitarian crisis unfolding on the border, where multiple reports of violence and deaths have emerged. Legal experts warn that this law represents a perilous ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ณ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€ that undermine the rule of law and fundamental rights. By stripping vulnerable individuals of the right to seek asylum, Poland risks not only contravening its constitutional obligations but also violating binding EU and international legal standards. This case exposes a critical tension in asylum law enforcement at the EUโ€™s borders: ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜‚๐—ฝ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ต๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜๐˜€ of those fleeing persecution. As the Polish government doubles down on restrictive measures, more attention is needed from the international community to scrutinize such policies through the lens of legality, proportionality, and humanity. #AsylumLaw #HumanRights #EUlaw #Poland #MigrationPolicy #RuleOfLaw #Migration #BorderControl #BorderManagement #Refugees #HumanitariansAtWork #LegalNews #LegalProtection Image credit: Newsweek. Refugee in Usnarz Gรณrny, Poland, in August 2021.