Actually the race-realism use last week, combined with this one, makes me realize that for them it’s just a fancy way of saying “world-view” [or what they consider to exist, and be true, which is not the craziest use of the word, but I would say unhelpful, and probably a small in-group marker].
It’s just a way of calling biases/prejudice legitimate.
And you know what, inasmuch the models have a “world-view” it IS annoyingly american in many ways. (at least the wrong kind of american.)
Also used for practicing my Japanese, I would say the usefulness was definitely not 0, if nothing else with the correct settings it was daily practice for the Japanese scripts (kana/kanji).
And it’s best It would definitely not bring you even to reading fluency, and was only good if you were supplementing your study with other language acquisition forms (like for example, in my case, living in Japan).
The examples were often stilted, and the accepted answers overly rigid, for sentences which weren’t necessarily realistic.
I think some of the worst aspects of the gamification were:
Let my streak/subscription lapse when it stopped being useful (got better reading exercise elsewhere), and uninstalled when they introduced AI shit.
I can’t imagine anyone really subjecting themselves to reading all that, I’m delighted for them though, or distraught that it happened…
It is a bit sad how Yarvin frontlines his “victory”, by quoting some extruded text, but in context—he is somehow kind enough to provide, maybe he didn’t bother reading all of that either—it’s just some fence-sitting big nothing, i doubt the claims that this produces any form of “red-pilled” Claude.
(I’m not sure what I expected, but it truly was a dead dove.)