| Location | Vorarlberg, Austria |
| Location | Vorarlberg, Austria |
I keep seeing versions of this post, which imply a bizarre misunderstanding of how we know the world.
Do people imagine that if we'd never observed galaxies or neutrinos or exoplanets or the cosmic microwave background, we could have *imagined* these things & that would be just as real?
Or that we've magically reached the point, just now, where we no longer need to observe the world?
My Friends Of A Certain Age, I say this with a GenXer's love: Firefly nostalgia is not going to be any healthier for us than Woodstock nostalgia was for our parents.
It's OK to grow and change. We will not be young again; we can let the things that were good when we were young, because we were young, go.
We don't need to our youth repackaged and sold back to us. We know what's at the end of that road.
The question is not whether you can create software using LLMs - you can (most software is just boring CRUD shit).
But you do pay a hefty price: In lowering quality (security issues, less maintainable), in skill decay in the people "guiding" the stochastic parrots, etc.
It's not "can 'AI's create software" but "are we willing to accept worse software running more and more of our lives?"