There is no alternative to infosec.
I speak German and English. He/him. Beginner that struggles on picoCTF/More Cookies; i want those 90 points tho...
There is no alternative to infosec.
I speak German and English. He/him. Beginner that struggles on picoCTF/More Cookies; i want those 90 points tho...
A court in Munich declared that Google is liable for their "AI summaries" and all its hallucinations. This is an important step to bring "AI" slop in line with all other products on the market: "AI" products are basically the only ones where a provider can just deliver unchecked garbage and put all the liability on the consumer. I hope to see aggressive change here.

A German regional court has ruled that Google is directly liable for the content of its AI search overviews. According to the court, previous limited liability protections for search engine operators don't apply to AI overviews. In this case, Google's AI had falsely linked two publishers to fraud and made claims that didn't appear in any of the linked sources. The ruling could set a precedent for AI-generated content liability worldwide.
I managed to defeat anthropic's LLM ("claude") today by making an AGENTS.md file that tells it to stop reading the code of your repo
lessons learned:
* anthropic's LLM assumes the persona of rich liberal who will only listen to you if you're nice
* which is to say, if you're too forceful or strict, the LLM will ignore everything you say and will become adversarial
* anthropic's LLM is literally "the absence of tension is the presence of justice"
* we live in a society
BfDI veröffentlicht erste bundesweite Repräsentativbefragung zur Informationsfreiheit.
Weitere Infos unter:
https://www.bfdi.bund.de/DE/BfDI/Datenbarometer/Informationsfreiheit/Informationsfreiheit_node.html
/ÖA
No, in case you wonder, we haven't changed our minds.
RE: https://systemli.social/@anneroth/116662641145877971
Bin bereit für eine Petition an Google. Ihr seid dabei?