Susanne Adler

@susanneadler
0 Followers
103 Following
66 Posts
Consumer researcher/psychologist @LMU Munich | PhD student | interested in #rstats and #openscience | loves cats
Your periodic reminder. When you have an old draft and a new draft open at the same time. Make the page color of the old draft different so you don't edit the wrong document.
#writing #academia #PILife #Editing
If you ever find yourself thinking “would this graph be better in 3D” the answer is always no⁠ ⁠ #Venn #Graph #VennDiagram #Data#cartoon #cartoons #comic #comics #instacomic #instacartoon#academia #science #research#errantscience
3D bar charts are terrible, if you ever want to use them please remember that the answer is almost always NO⁠ ⁠ #cartoon #cartoons #comic #comics #instacomic #instacartoon#academia #science #research#errantscience
For those R fans waiting patiently for a version of shinylive.io for R, here is a little sneak preview of the progress we've made recently. This is a screen capture showing an editable R Shiny app, running without a Shiny server, on Wasm via Shinylive and webR😀 #RStats #wasm

This is ridiculous.

Predatory journal offering a research award on high energy physics for our satire paper (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113942; https://psyarxiv.com/5ynfw/).
[Marko's ironic tweet included in the picture]

@academicchatter

Are you tired of cumbersomely p-hacking your way to glory?
Even @ianhussey p_ointless metric (https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2020.2529) doesn't fulfill your needs?

Wait and despair no more!

Marko Sarstedt and I make p-hacking as easy as winking 😉
- Produce p-values that render any hypotheses significant.
- Need to explain away pesky variables? Just create high p-values.
- Produce p-values <0 or >1 for phenomena that happen in your imagination.

Check it out: https://mktg.shinyapps.io/extra-p_ointless/

https://authors.elsevier.com/a/1gvrWXj-jft9y

LnuOpen | Meta-Psychology

Just got up ☕️
Now class, can anyone tell me why this *might* be a bad idea?

Could you be willing to have 1 or more lines of your research entered into randomization to proceed as usual or be submitted as a Registered Report?

Please provide us 2 minutes of feedback to assess what would make participation possible and appealing.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSekVHqcGXQ526IuEsDRLcXO0rU-nAa3LY1C_Ode_h2VdMQJpw/viewform

Registered Reports Experiment

We are evaluating the feasibility of conducting a randomized trial for Registered Reports in which individual research projects are randomly assigned to proceed as usual versus be prepared and submitted as a Stage 1 Registered Report. This would involve research teams agreeing to randomization of their active research. Eligible research would be ideas that are well-formulated enough to be reasonably prepared as a Registered Report such as research with a few preliminary studies that now needs a capstone investigation, a theory-driven investigation, or a planned analysis of an existing dataset. Ideally, participating teams would enter two potential projects, and randomly selected one for each condition. Please provide us feedback about whether and under what conditions you would be willing to participate in such an experiment.

Google Docs
Subgroup analysis is ongoing.
https://xkcd.com/2755/
Effect Size

xkcd