Snarky (he/him/his)

@snarkyboy
70 Followers
105 Following
577 Posts
Former #productmanagement blogger, now working as an advisor to LE/GE product teams. Also a former #lawyer, avid #gamer, and #wine / #beer / #cocktail aficionado. Former #prodmgmt #blogger at cleverpm.com.
“The reason so many of yesterday’s free-speech champions transitioned so easily into today’s pro-Trump censors is that their definition of free speech never included the right of others to talk back.” https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2025/12/bari-weiss-censorship-free-speech-hypocrisy/685404/?gift=UDCAY75CzHyGUPSsXwkpWhLl6VMZEq1k0O1H833V2Hk
Cancel Culture’s Boomerang Effect

How we got to a place where free speech means whatever conservatives want to say

The Atlantic
@mlb Makes total sense with Harry ready to back up Cal in 2026 and beyond.
@pfitz I'd never call it a "good" movie, but it is certainly entertaining and does what it sets out to do (for the most part).
@horrornerdonline God, I loved this movie so much more than I probably should have!!
The best part of being a #SeattleMariners fan is that you can never be disappointed. Their falls from grace are as predictable as rain in the PNW.
@MythicalMothman I'm a 5'0", 250-lb 65yo who wants to lose 124 lbs but shouldn't struggle too much since they're advanced at exercising. They just recovered from a broken hip, so they gained the weight during rehab.
@cory I think most people's "private" personal information has been "public" for a very long time at this point. :)
@cory Either way it's a scam -- either you lose money or the attorneys take it all.
@evanpeterjones Every one of these movies seems to be trying to "recapture" the lightning in the bottle that was created between Williamson and Craven, which is damn near impossible. Rather, they should be taking the premise and expanding on it, creating something new, not just rehashing the old. Ironically, that's what the first movie did so well -- deconstruct the tropes. Then it became its own trope to be rehashed over and over again.
@e_eric Having had some hands-on time with it, I can totally see why they're canning it. It was beautiful, but very difficult to use. The time still remaining before they could have effectively monetized it probably wasn't worth the cost of continuing development. TBH, it wasn't that "innovative" and more flash than substance.