@rhizome

39 Followers
361 Following
344 Posts

Why is taxing private jets considered to be "ideological" when we know private jets emit multiples more carbon dioxide per passenger than commercial flights and that their use is growing at an alarming rate.

The policy is based on hard evidence and should be in every party's policy if they are serious about tackling climate change.

https://phys.org/news/2024-11-private-jet-carbon-emissions-soar.html

#GE24 #ClimateEmergency

Private jet carbon emissions soar 46%: Study

The carbon footprint from private jet travel grew 46 percent between 2019 and 2023 and will keep rising unless the ultra-luxury industry is regulated, according to new research published Thursday.

Phys.org

Marc Andreessen: “And another thing! We would’ve solved climate change in the 70s if the pesky environmentalists hadn’t killed nuclear power!”

Also Marc Andreessen: “I’m proud to announce we’re working with one of the most brutal, repressive, corrupt regimes in history to help them launder their oil money on a computer that uses ⅛ of the global electric supply to generate ransom notes.”

@cstross Was about to ask if this included Tories.
Not Again! Two More Cases, Just this Week, of Hallucinated Citations in Court Filings Leading to Sanctions

For all the discussion of how generative AI will impact the legal profession, maybe one answer is that it will weed out the lazy and incompetent lawyers. By now, in the wake of several cases in which...

LawSites

one of Motherboard's last articles warns of what's coming

whoever's left in U.S. journalism please turn out the lights and put the dishes in the sink before you go to bed

https://www.vice.com/en/article/ak38xb/ai-generated-propaganda-is-just-as-persuasive-as-the-real-thing-worrying-study-finds

AI-Generated Propaganda Is Just as Persuasive as the Real Thing, Worrying Study Finds

Propaganda from popular AI tools “could blend into online information environments on par with…existing foreign covert propaganda campaigns."

Remember how part of killing the #Reddit API was also to curb 'theft' of their data by AI harvesters?

Hahahahahahaa.

https://www.theverge.com/2024/2/17/24075670/reddit-ai-training-license-deal-user-content

Reddit has a new AI training deal to sell user content

Reddit has reportedly made a deal with an unnamed AI company to allow access to its platform’s content for the purposes of AI model training.

The Verge

~100 more Starlink v1 satellites will be burning up in the upper atmosphere in the next 6 months, bringing up the total number of de-orbited Starlink satellites to ~500 out of 6000 launched
https://api.starlink.com/public-files/Commitment%20to%20Space%20Sustainability.pdf

De-orbiting satellites by burning them up did work when the volume of satellites was small, but already 10% of aerosol particules in the stratosphere contain aluminum/other metals.
The problem is only going to get worse with the launch of megaconstellations https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2313374120

So this is worse than when I and others found a lot of sensitive documents on Microsoft Documents back in 2017 (see this article for more info: https://www.csoonline.com/article/560819/microsoft-axed-docs-com-search-option-after-private-files-were-shared-publicly.html )

Scribd is leaking a lot of things.

And, just like Microsoft Documents, the issue is the User Experience. Both Scribd and Microsoft Documents is meant to help users upload their documents and share them with others. These services storing sensitive documents is not the issue.

The issue is its apparent default behavior for users to inadvertently share these documents PUBLICLY and SEARCHABLE.

https://www.scribd.com

#infosec

(cc @dangoodin @zackwhittaker @lorenzofb @briankrebs )

Microsoft axed Docs.com search option after private files were shared publicly

Microsoft quietly removed the search option on Docs.com after potential PEBKAC/ID10T errors; users set private and sensitive files to be viewed publicly.

CSO Online

Study finds women more likely to apply to job ads with precise qualifications. For one vague ad, 6% of qualified women applied vs 22% of men. With more precise lang, 29% of women applied. In another, 42% of women applied vs 56% of men; precise ad=62% of women.

This gives some empirical support to the oft-quoted stat that men apply for a job when they meet 60% of the qualifications, but women apply only if they meet 100% of them.
https://womensagenda.com.au/business/vague-language-in-job-ads-can-push-women-away-new-research-shows-how-employers-can-attract-more-female-applicants/

Vague language in job ads can push women away. New research shows how employers can attract more female applicants

New research shows women are less likely to apply for higher-level positions that have vague language in the qualifications on job postings.

Women's Agenda