| Website | https://www.prisma-platform.eu |
| Code | https://codeberg.org/prisma-platform |
| Blog | https://blog.prisma-platform.eu |
| Contact | [email protected] |
The EU AI Act transparency obligations take effect August 2026.
Most organisations are still asking how to comply.
The answer is not a compliance tool. It is an architecture decision.
PROV-O records every action. ODRL enforces every policy. SHACL validates every object. All W3C. All auditable.
Compliance is not a feature you bolt on. It is a property of how information is structured.
prisma-platform.eu
The technical bridge cannot survive without the governance foundation.
You can build the most elegant federation architecture.
Without defined ownership, it will be ignored.
Governance first. Technology second.
Full post: blog.prisma-platform.eu/s2-2
Defined ownership + ODRL per Named Graph:
Each information object has exactly one accountable owner.
That ownership is encoded as an ODRL policy.
The policy is machine-readable and enforceable.
No central authority required.
When ownership is explicit → federation becomes possible.
When it is ambiguous → silos persist.
Works for any organisation. Government, healthcare, NGO, enterprise.
A data silo is not primarily a technical structure.
It is an organisational structure that has found a technical expression.
When a department cannot answer "who is responsible for this information?" — the data stays in the silo regardless of which integration tool you deploy.
Governance first. API second.
Integration projects fail because they solve the wrong problem.
Data silos persist not because systems are incompatible — but because ownership is undefined.
The technical bridge cannot survive without the governance foundation.
🧵
Federated data spaces are not a product category.
They are a governance model — and governance belongs to the commons, not to a platform provider.
Prisma is the implementation. The standards are the foundation.
Full post: blog.prisma-platform.eu/federated-data-spaces
A data space built on a vendor platform is not a commons.
It is a commons with a landlord.
The landlord sets the rules.
The landlord can raise the rent.
The landlord can leave.
W3C open standards have no landlord.
SPARQL has no vendor.
PROV-O has no subscription fee.
Gaia-X federation services → W3C open standards:
🪪 Identity & trust → W3C DID + ODRL (did:wba sovereign identity)
🔄 Sovereign data exchange → SPARQL SERVICE (federated query, no replication)
📚 Federated catalogue → DCAT2 (dataset catalogue per node)
✅ Compliance proof → SHACL + PROV-O (validation + immutable audit)
No proprietary middleware. No central authority.
Europe is building data spaces.
Most implementations recreate the same centralisation problem — with a European flag on top.
The alternative, built entirely on W3C open standards, already exists.
It just needs to be deployed.
🧵
Organisations have invested enormously in storing more data and moving it faster.
The ability to answer "why did we decide this, and on what basis?" has not improved.
More data does not close the context gap. Named Graphs do.
Full post: blog.prisma-platform.eu/s2-1