After reviewing January 2026’s (and all of 2025, 2024, 2023, …) performance I have decided to retire the phrase “happy new year” for good.
Going to say “Meet new year, worse than old year” from next year because we already know.
After reviewing January 2026’s (and all of 2025, 2024, 2023, …) performance I have decided to retire the phrase “happy new year” for good.
Going to say “Meet new year, worse than old year” from next year because we already know.
It is really not clear to me what GoI has done to earn this much trust on the question of AI governance. What explains this?
https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2025/10/15/trust-in-own-country-to-regulate-use-of-ai/
I think this is extensible to other subjects and regions, and has so many implications for framing and public discourse.
https://ourworldindata.org/does-the-news-reflect-what-we-die-from
Really good conversation between
Alan Rozenshtein, Jess Miers and @Noupside.
Esp. 40mins onwards where they really nerd out on the broader question of liability of generative ai speech. Flagging that I am a bit biased here, since I lean towards the "publisher" framing. I am (potentially) oversimplifying here, so listen to the whole conversation.