@LorcanaJSON It has made clear that, had we advanced faster, we would have certainly had to revert things or build very ugly things to align with the lorcanajson structure.

That's why I'm reaching out and on a public forum.

Mainly, we would be looking at effect types and trigger types.

@LorcanaJSON Honestly, we were not further than making some object diagrams right now. We made these before the 2.0 datamodel update.

The 2.0 datamodel update didn't exaclty cross our thinking. It did make some choices. Absolutely nothing we find incomprehensible. On the contrary, we had not built anything yet, so our diagrams lacked any insights from building the real thing on the real card data.

@LorcanaJSON This update gave us a lot of work, but work we wanted to get into at some point! You've saved us a lot of time by modelling the abilities in the way that you have! Thanks!!

Do you have plans to go further with modelling abilities?

@LorcanaJSON Thanks a million!

Why, oh why have they changed the card numbering away from alphabetic?

@LorcanaJSON Thanks for your time and effort in making these datafiles available!

I found this repo too : https://github.com/great-illuminary/lorcana-data

How can people decide on which repository to use? Any major differences in design or purpose between the two that you would like to point out?