Luis
@oncoming
- 20 Followers
- 484 Following
- 767 Posts
Just followed https://www.reddit.com/r/CanyonBikes/comments/1cjcgxe/luggage_rack_on_a_carbon_road_bike_tailfin/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button (de: https://www.rennrad-news.de/forum/threads/howto-gep%C3%A4cktr%C3%A4ger-am-carbon-rennrad.193418/) to fit a rack to my #Canyon Grizl CF SF 6 AXS (2024), worked like a charm an much cheaper than a #Tailfin. Spacers for the axle were not needed. Only 50mm tires might be a little tight.
@muhnin Kein problem, ja das sollte passen 👍🏼
@muhnin Theoretisch beliebig hoch. Das Gerät selbst wird nie mehr als 1.58A ziehen wenn es 19V sind.
DC natürlich noch, aber das sollte eh passen.
Ich könnte mir höchstens vorstellen, dass Netzteile mit sehr viel mehr Ampere die Spannung dann nicht mehr so genau liefern könnten. Deswegen würde ich so nah wie möglich über 1.58A bleiben. Wenn es aber nicht anderes gibt sollte es trotzdem funktionieren. Und für die Effizienz / Sicherheit ist es auch normalerweise besser wenn es weniger A sind.
@muhnin Hey, halb. Das Netzteil muss genau 19V und _mindestens_ 1.58A haben. Also z.B. 2A aber eigentlich nicht 1.5A.
Used one metal 5.3x10x1mm DIN-125-A spacer to fix it now (with screws tightened to 3Nm). Mostly an inconvenience but would be nice if these were included.
Got a #Tailfin 10l Fork Pack for my Canyon Grizl (Carbon Fork). For the price I‘m a little disappointed with the rounded mount which presses into the mostly flat carbon of the fork (fortunately I did not tighten it to more than 1Nm). I‘m a little concerned this dents / breaks the carbon with more force.
The #Ortlieb Fork Packs specifically have optional spacers to ensure the mount presses against the metal screw housing in the fork, not against the surrounding carbon material.
@emacsen Radicle seems similar to what you describe: https://lwn.net/Articles/966869/
Not sure if that qualifies as „well used“ thought
@mariuxdeangelo Yes, that‘s the case. However in a normal system it‘s not Nautilus specifically but the kernel which tells the user application it is done, and them subsequently syncs data from the page cache in RAM (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_cache) to the disk. Idea is of course to speed things up in case the user changes their mind about the write (and for a lot of other workloads this is also highly effective, but I see how it causes unintuitive behaviour here).