@nhan

40 Followers
61 Following
723 Posts

Please tell me where I got things wrong.

Very likely to move to Threads once it federated.

Threadshttps://www.threads.net/@nhan.nt.000
PKM.social (not very active)https://pkm.social/@nhan
mindly.social (inactive)https://mindly.social/@nhan
Edit: It's me who's dumb. I just re-read it and he said “all the same”, and that's true. I apologize for my mistake, I should've read it more carefully.
---
Another dumb statement from a #RoamResearch **co-founder**, claiming that when using #Logseq and #Obsidian sync, they have access to your data.

Those who use #Raindrop might be interested: it's now open-source.

https://twitter.com/raindrop_io/status/1716885324004274436

Raindrop.io on X

@TomFrankly @nerdymomocat I’m not decided what licence to use. But anybody can use code as they like, even in commercial project, no problem

X (formerly Twitter)

Exhibit A of why people don't use #Mastodon. Let's migrate/use small servers, and you're there by yourself. If I were that person, I thought there isn't a somewhat vibrant Logseq community on Mastodon.

https://clacks.link/@glitch25/111228963435193618

Marcos (@[email protected])

Just recently discovered #LogSeq . Anybody using it? What do you like and not like about it? I use an outlining web app called #Checkvist right now in which I implement a partial #GTD process. It feels like LogSeq does a lot of organization that could be useful. I think Checkvist can do some of the similar things, but it feels like LogSeq was built to do them where as Checkvist developed them as additions to the core "list" functionality. But that's just my impression.

The Clacks
ChatGPT browsing returned no results.
Bing gave shitty results: It consistently found articles not in the time range I specified. Apparently, it prioritizes recently published articles.

Oh well, it took a while but I'm seeing signs of Google catching up with OpenAI and Microsoft in this LLM arm race.

I wanted to find an article I read in the New York Times around Feb or March this but I didn't remember the title. I've tried using traditional search tools (Bing and Google and limit time range). Based loosely on the format of the article, Bard was able to resurface the article for me.

There're just so many things factually wrong.

1- Adjust the filters on #Logseq Github issues and see that 1/3 to 1/2 issues are closed automatically because of no activity.
2- Stats of bug reports in #Obsidian can easily be seen on the Obsidian forum.

Neat. We have account on Mastodon spewing misleading information when they know better, and it's getting traction.

Per CNN, "Musk’s decision … was driven by an acute fear that Russia would respond to a Ukrainian attack on Crimea with nuclear weapons, a fear driven home by Musk’s conversations with senior Russian officials, according to Isaacson".

And it became "calls with Putin" and "collude with war criminals". See how the post is designed to mislead you :)

https://mastodon.social/@flexghost/111024332008080119

Chris Nielsen (@chris.nielsen.nz) on Threads

The instance I was on did this as well. I had a horrible argument with them which boiled down to ‘we have decided unilaterally to block threads and if you don’t like it you can go elsewhere’ so I did. I dropped mastodon entirely and came here. I refuse to have anything to do with admins acting like dictators and sadly it seems a popular thing

Threads
Noticing the fan of my laptop kicked in although I was doing nothing. Open Task Manager and see that #Logseq is taking up 8% of my CPU although I closed it 15 mins ago. Kill the process and the fan stopped.