Mathieu Caron-Diotte

@mcarondiotte
427 Followers
421 Following
486 Posts
PhD, Université de Montréal. Interested in identity, relative deprivation, collective memory, and statistics.
Websitehttp://mcarondiotte.ca
Pronouns/Pronomshe/him, il/lui

Replication of the link between perceived threat of a #pandemic and compliance with #publicHealth recommendations in 18 country, longitudinal study and U.S. follow-ups.

The #preprint also reports correlations with *political trust*.
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/d3jtn_v1

(I didn't see our philosophy measures.)

OSF

Register for the Replication Research Symposium organized by FORRT and the Münster Center for Open Science (online & on-site)!

Register for free (on-site or virtual*) before March 31st:
🔗 https://indico.uni-muenster.de/event/3176/registrations/3152/

📅 3-day symposium on replications & reproductions (14–16 May 2025)
👩‍🏫 Join an open and interdisciplinary discourse with experts from multiple fields
🔓 Shape the in-development diamond open access replication journal 🧵

Replication Research Symposium

Uni Münster Indico (Indico)

Image of me reading the documentation for pivot_wider() then attempting to use it 2 seconds later.

#RStats

Losing your job is bad for your health, but there are things you can do to minimize the harm
https://buff.ly/Rz0MUTm
Losing your job is bad for your health, but there are things you can do to minimize the harm

It’s not just about having money problems − it’s how you feel about those problems that matters most for your mental health.

The Conversation
💫 New Chapter 4 in our open textbook "Theoretical Modeling for Cognitive Science", with an accessible introduction to the concept of formal proof. 🧮📝 https://computationalcognitivescience.github.io/lovelace/part_ii/proofs
Formal proofs

In the previous chapter we introduced different mathematical frameworks that alllow us to formally define theoretical models. This allows us not only to prec...

As I keep saying, peer review is a pretty new thing, and it doesn’t have to be the way it is now.

Thank you to the Royal Society, this will be an ✨amazing✨scholarly resource!!

“The initial process was much more informal than the one scientists know today, which became formalized in the 1970s … the Royal Society was asking reviewers to respond to standardized questions, (which) could prompt brief responses even to significant pieces of work.”

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03287-4

The early days of peer review: five insights from historical reports

A crop of referee reports from the Royal Society’s archive reveal discussions about cutting printing costs, reviewer holidays and even editing images.

Fake science : panorama des méconduites et contre-feux pour déjouer les pièges

Webinaire de Guillaume Cabanac proposé par Inria

tidytuesday/2024/2024-02-13 at main · borstell/tidytuesday

Repo for TidyTuesday contributions. Contribute to borstell/tidytuesday development by creating an account on GitHub.

GitHub
I am attending Novel Methods and Applications for Measuring Cultural Distance Between Groups! Come join me if you're attending SPSP 2024 Annual Convention. #SPSP2024 - via #Whova event app
Amazing talks on inequality at #SPSP2024