Is anyone already actively/productively using #Wireguard?
| Operating system of choice | Arch Linux |
| Favorite programming language | Rust, of course, but C++ was my first love lol |
πΈπππ©
- 31 Followers
- 20 Following
- 586 Posts
Computer science graduate, interested in #infosec, networking and general geeky things π€ β Linux shill β There's no place like ~
@ScottMortimer That's cool, I haven't heard of any provider that markets that yet. Then again I also didn't check any π
infosec.exchange right now..
@leip4Ier Yes, I agree. Thankfully, I live in such a country and my ISP is a bit of a privacy activist π
@leip4Ier Too bad the performance is usually sub-optimal.. π€
But I guess you get to decide between privacy and comfort. #heywiretap
But I guess you get to decide between privacy and comfort. #heywiretap
@leip4Ier Hmm, that's true.. So TOR it is? π
@leip4Ier Ah, I misunderstood you then π
Until we have ECH*, I guess the only mitigation for that is a VPN, however it technically only moves the problem and the involved trust to the VPN provider.
*: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication#Encrypted_Client_Hello
@leip4Ier But isn't that the SNI of the resolver? From my understanding, the HTTP request inside the TLS session contains the domain to resolve: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8484#section-4.1
@kev Now combine this with Vanilla.js and you have a complete frontend stack π