It’s also sort of interesting that I’m seeing a lot of C++ and Rust AI shit. I mean, if you can’t write code then why wouldn’t you pick the “best” options. But, why not just ask for it in assembly? Or something insanely low-level? Is this an opportunity for AI? Can I “present” a higher-level, conversational “language” and behind the scenes, produce machine code?
Luke
@lukef
- 12 Followers
- 52 Following
- 58 Posts
Developer by trade, chef at heart. Australian living in the USA. Go aficionado. Mobile / web developer. I don't have a SoundCloud or OnlyFans.
There is a flood of Linux-based TUI and/or utility apps that are clearly AI product and I’m conflicted because it’s great to see additions to the Linux ecosystem but disheartening that they’re all mostly garbage.
I just said "This is the life!" as I slid into bed at 8:30pm.
Michael Nau is seriously great.
Smokeflowers / Sing To, by Michael Nau
2 track album
Bryan Adams was wrong. It wasn't about the summer of 69, it was the summer of 91. Use Your Illusion and Mario Bros 3. Fuck yeah.
What these things should be trained to do are tasks like code analysis, refactoring, simple amendments to code that take time, TESTING! Imagine never writing a unit test ever again!?
I'm forming an opinion that code-focused "AI" sucks because it's being asked to do the absolute wrong things. It shouldn't be writing code "from scratch" because it can't do that well. It can't even really copy code well because everyone keeps saying "it's not really production ready".
Imagine hiring someone and saying "well, they can't really write production-level code".