age: ____
age at birth (if different from age): ____
a club of (a)gender(less) magical girl kouhais đâ¨.
slightly-charred (un)official treehouse developer-kouhai and #NetCatGirlRelOpenInfraDevSecSourceGirlRelOps practitioner. definitely not Riko Ayano (Catulus Syndrome). Sufficiently Reliable Engineer supporting unknown infra. baps around CLs. sometimes ghostwrites for @staff
follow requests OK! (see pinned)
English (GenAm) / ä¸ć (OK).
aroace yurinormative lesbian
đłď¸âđđłď¸ââ§ď¸
18+
https://kouhai.dev
https://gitea.treehouse.systems/kouhai
| pronouns | she (her????) |
| *nods* | kouhais? |
| headpats? | *pats* |
| collective noun | club |
| đ | â¸ď¸ |
age: ____
age at birth (if different from age): ____
Every year, I help organize Minnebar, largest and longest-running technology unconference inâŚthe US? North America? The Western Hemisphere? Weâre not sure. Itâs about 1000 people strong every year, and this is its 20th year. https://minnestar.org/minnebar/
The whole thing is volunteer-driven: people volunteer to lead sessions. Thereâs no application and no screening beyond the CoC; if you want to talk about it, raise your hand and you can.
This year, something interesting happened with the session topics.
đ§ľ
Hey for anyone who lives in Canada:
I've been thinking about trying to do a drive from Vancouver to Calgary, because the drive looks absolutely fucking beautiful and I have reasons to try to do such a thing
however, I don't know what the like. Vibes of the area are. Anything I should try to see if I did? Anything I should extremely avoid if I did? What am I potentially committing to
the thing about ânever attribute to malice what can be easily explained by incompetenceâ is that itâs rat-fuckable
when there is functionally no difference between the two, engaging with someone as if theyâre incompetent means accepting their frame, that what theyâre ultimately trying to accomplish isnât *bad*, theyâre just going about it in a way with bad side-effects, and people use in bad-faith our good-faith willingness to treat them as incompetent to push their agendas
engaging with someone as if theyâre malicious, on the other hand, means rejecting the harmful frame, recasting the argument in terms of âwhy are you trying to do this bad thing?â, and not quibbling about the details of why the thing is bad
these age-verification laws whose implementations are a form of category error is a good example; if you engage with a proponent of them with âwell hereâs why your implementation is badâ youâre tacitly approving the larger idea that surveliance is good, and you just disagree with the techniques; bad-faith actors use this
If instead you come back with âwhy are you trying to surveil everyoneâs computer use? Why are you laying the groundwork to prevent people from using their own computers?â, you re-cast the frame. Sure, there are probably incompetent people who donât realize the results of what theyâre going to do, but casting the larger idea into question AND KEEPING IT IN QUESTION is the only effective path Iâve found to debating people on things like this
so, instead:
donât ascribe to incompetence something that is functionally malicious
Alright y'all I need VN recs, my friends have taken to doing livedubs of various ones and we're looking for stuff to add to the backlog
We've done:
Current considerations are (I have 0 clue how fun these would be to riff over):
Other considerations that we would not be going in 100% blind for: