We're just microdosing apocolypse these days.
#!/dev/null
| Webpage: | https://jaystapleton.ca/ |
| pets: | Cats:Pollyester and Penelope. Dog:Juno |
| Ask me about | Tailscale |
| Pronouns | He/Him |
- 382 Followers
- 384 Following
- 1.2K Posts
I work on networks, but mostly cat-and-shitpost on the socials.
#!/dev/null
#!/dev/null
@xabean I was thinking something like that, and didn't for the same reason.
I downloaded a model from printables for the 49mm portafilter my Zacconi uses, but it didn't have enough of a "lip" and would slide off when I was stirring with a distribution tool, so I re-did it with some gaps for the "ears" like you did.
@tsjost @tailscale a good place to start is to disable key expiry. I use device postures for my access control, and generally disable key expiry everywhere.
@tsjost @tailscale Can you try again? I've just logged out a couple of devices and could log back in, so it's not an outage, but might be something specific to yours.
If it's still reporting that, running `tailscale bugreport` and including that number in a support ticket is going to give that team more info about what's happening on your machine at the time.
I *have* seen 500 errors when connected to a network that is actively blocking controlplane.tailscale.com
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/bill-c-22-surveillance-privacy-law-enforcement-9.7220814
Good coverage from the CBC, though I think it should be a bit more pointed. First paragraph reads:
"The Liberal government is being accused of rushing through Parliament a deeply controversial bill that would make it easier for police and spies to tap private communications during investigations."
It would make it easier for *literally everybody* to tap private communications. If the data doesn't exist, nobody can get it. If you force the data to be retained that is no longer the case.
