Jaime Herazo

@jherazob
0 Followers
57 Following
705 Posts
I am not here, it's just your imagination
@joshbressers "Oh don't be so paranoid, there's no *proof* the corporate entity that has ruined the last dozen things it has touched is gonna ruin *this* thing. Oh, and Charlie Brown, I'm sure Lucy isn't gonna pull the football away this time and let you kick it for once~"

For anyone who lacks the advanced level of age I mean experience some of us have, you should read this Wikipedia page on Embrace, Extend, and Extinguish

I guarantee this is the goal of Meta joining the fediverse

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguish

Embrace, extend, and extinguish - Wikipedia

@stux @scirave The existential threat comes from a process that isn't solved by blocking at "the first sight of things going wrong". In fact that's precisely the reaction they're hoping for.

They only start the really sketchy stuff once they're an entrenched incumbent with majority control over key areas of development and a critical mass audience. By the time that happens, defederating destroys the communities you support, making it untenable.

How do you plan to resolve this?

@Grapevine
Email *also* was built to survive attempts at takeover, but ask anyone trying to run their own mail server today how well that works now.
Or ask about XMPP, and how all the major players used to support it and now it's a footnote in tech history.
The fact that something is open and free doesn't make it blinded to corporate takeover. We don't warn because Meta Bad, we warn *because it has already happened many times*
At this point if you don't listen it's on you.
@bjc @aral
And that's why we must act now while we still can

@stux @trebach No, I missed you doing the bare minimum to fix the problem you created, amidst all the posting about how much you don't like another admin.

Good for you. Now do the thinking before the clicking, next time, instead of after, when the complaints have become inconvenient.

@stux Dude, what are you doing? You suspended a whole instance, impacting hundreds of users who chose, of their own volition, to follow people on .art, because you don't like the person who runs it?

That is very bad form, especially since it happened without warning for people on both sides, people who know nothing about your grudges.

The proper thing to do here would be to admit fault, remove the suspension, and then inform your users about it, so they can restore their connections if they so choose.

You're a big boi, don't be doing this Nathan-style fit of rage nonsense 😒

UPDATE: Suspension removed; https://mstdn.social/@stux/110570709034574825

stux⚡ (@[email protected])

.art has been unblocked because it was a bad decsion from my part to block the whole community instead of the nasty admin.. Unblocked the domain and suspended the admin I'm afraid it's only a matter of time before that admin is gonna look for things to ban us That's what they do

Mastodon 🐘
@[email protected] @jrp
All the context i have is the current situation, if she has in fact attacked you and done *actual* hate speech to you then that *IS* a different thing and in that case i DO apologize, but then your wording requires improvement, as it seems to imply that the current criticism of people with the Meta situation is hate speech, which is ludicrous, regardless of past history

@[email protected] @jrp
Still haven't seen any evidence of art scraping social, and defederating a whole instance for criticism? yeah, no, that's pure drama i don't want.

Also *specifically to you*, comparing criticism to hate speech is utterly reproachable behavior, you should be outright ashamed for doing that, actual people receiving hate speech are hurt every time somebody does what you did.

Some fediverse instance admins: “How cool, Meta invited us to the adult table.”

Yes, they did.

Because you’re what’s for dinner.

#fediverse #mastodon #meta #Project92 #BigTech #SiliconValley #SurveillanceCapitalism