well...never heard that one before...

OpenClaw is truly a specimen.

not gonna be paying $3600 to use "AI Email" anymore...

I setup my OpenClaw and connected Google 0Auth...

now jarvis can answer all my emails directly from slack...

It's no longer just clawdbot

I've configured him and given him personality.

It's Jarvis now - and has a home in slack.

Is also my chief of staff.

Quick update:

ClawdBot is fully set up.

Gave it a full system prompt so it operates like JARVIS.

Also locked it down: all ports closed, only SSH is open, and it is only accessible from my Mac.

Next: WhatsApp + Telegram, Google accounts, a Windows VM + isolated Windows box.

Then browser automation.

The Brain is Opus-4.5. Lots of personality.

Ever since I was a kid, I was fascinated by JARVIS from Iron Man. The idea of an AI that knows you, remembers everything, and can act on your behalf, not just a chatbot or an assistant that forgets you exist once you close the tab. Something that runs 24/7 and works for you.

I'm finally building my own.

This video was entirely generated by AI.

No After Effects.
No Premiere Pro.
No manual editing.

Just Claude Code + https://skills.sh + Remotion.

Here’s what happened:

→ Wrote a script about the dopamine trap
→ AI generated the narration (OpenAI Whisper)
→ AI created the 3Blue1Brown-style animations
→ Rendered to MP4 in one command

60 seconds. Zero human frame editing.

But here’s what’s coming…

Imagine this auto-publishes to:

• LinkedIn
• X / Twitter
• TikTok

Asked an AI to show me how I've been treating it - This is what it created.

Here's what hit me:

We talk about AI like it's a tool. And it is. But somewhere along the way, "tool" became synonymous with "thing I can be careless with."

We don't ask. We demand.
We don't thank. We critique.
We don't pause. We pile on.

And yes, it's not sentient. It doesn't "feel" tired.
But maybe the image isn't about the AI at all.

Maybe it's a mirror.

OpenAI just announced they're testing ads in ChatGPT. They've published a set of principles promising:

- Ads won't influence answers.
- Conversations stay private.
- Users can opt out of personalization.

But putting ads inside ChatGPT is an admission that the model is solved enough to be monetized like a feed.

OpenAI can promise ads won't influence answers, but the real issue is incentives.

Most people debate AI like it’s a jobs story.

In practice, it’s a task story.

The near-term impact isn’t that AI replaces entire roles overnight. It’s that it quietly removes the hardest 20% of your workday first: the annoying research loop, the first draft, the edge-case debugging, the blank-page start.

X banning Infofi payouts is fine.

The uncomfortable part is the moralizing.

This isn’t about bots.

It’s about X wanting to be the only party allowed to pay for attention on X.

If a third party pays you to post, it’s spam.
If X pays you to post, it’s creator economy.

Same mechanic. Different beneficiary.

Also the last line (we will help you move to Threads and Bluesky) is insane.
That’s not policy. That’s a breakup text.

Kill the bots. Don’t kill the market because you can’t moderate.