Please teach your students not to do this.

I understand there is a continuum between spellcheck/grammar check and LLMs, and there could be ways to use LLMs to improve wording or grammar, etc.

But please teach your students not to use LLMs to “draft content”. I don't care if they disclose it (tbh, I prefer they don't!). I don't care if they "take responsibility for the content".

The thing about writing is that it has a social function. The social function is *not* to cause text to exist. The social function is to communicate from your mind to my mind. Text is the means, not the end. If you must use an LLM, skip it and just send me the prompt.

(No, I'm not going to link to the paper. The point is not to dunk on people who end up on the wrong side of a social question. The point is to do better.)

So this afternoon a person in #ALIFE2025 's demo hall was explaining to me how they used an LLM to bounce ideas of domains they weren't familiar with.

It reminded me of when @lspector came to give a talk in my lab, back when I was a master student. He said something that left an impression on me: "all my cool ideas I had while having a beer with someone else".

So I guess that is something that "brainstorming with LLMs" steals from you. You're not having that beer with someone else anymore.