Giulia Gentile

@gentile_giulia
149 Followers
122 Following
94 Posts
Tech experts are starting to doubt that ChatGPT and A.I. ‘hallucinations’ will ever go away: ‘This isn’t fixable’

Experts are starting to doubt it, and even OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is a bit stumped.

Fortune

"Christopher Nolan's #Oppenheimer explores the work of physicist J. Robert Oppenheimer & colleagues to create the atomic bomb.

Yet, the film fails to depict a key part of the story, using 2 female scientists as stand-ins for ALL of the women who contributed."

Hundreds of women were essential to the Manhattan Project, including Nobel Prize winning physicist Maria Goeppert Mayer. But they are largely absent in the #film.

https://www.businessinsider.com/women-manhattan-project-christopher-nolan-oppenheimer-completely-ignored-2023-7 #HistoryRemix #science #history

The women that Nolan's new film 'Oppenheimer' completely ignored

Women serving in key roles like explosion techs, librarians, and hematologists were essential to the Manhattan Project.

Insider

By means of a new Regulation, the #EU is targeting illegal logging and #deforestation and #humanrights implications.

While certainly a step up, it is still questionable whether #EUDR offers adequate protection, analyses ROMY KLIMKE.

https://verfassungsblog.de/out-of-the-woods/

Okay, taking a few moments to reat (some of) the #gpt4 paper. It's laughable the extent to which the authors are writing from deep down inside their xrisk/longtermist/"AI safety" rabbit hole.

Things they aren't telling us:
1) What data it's trained on
2) What the carbon footprint was
3) Architecture
4) Training method

>>

In the early hours this morning...WOW!! Michelle Hanson of MHPhotoco got these shots of the Northern Lights. She calls them rainbow lights.
#Alaska #NorthernLights
Section 230 Is a Load-Bearing Wall—Is It Coming Down? – The Markup

A conversation with James Grimmelmann and Kate Klonick

Therefore, it is conceptually and legally flawed to separate enquiries on the bindingness and the validity of an EU measure in the context of judicial review. Additionally, the distinction between validity and bindingness may complicate the way in which EU law’s effects may be understood at the national level and, in particular, how national authorities apply EU law. You can find the contributions to the Yearbook here: https://lnkd.in/ei9STkX8
Great to see the 2022 MPI Yearbook of European Procedural Law published! I contributed with a paper on the interplay between #bindingness and #validity in the #judicialreview of #EUlaw, focusing on the FBF case. I argue that a stark bifurcation of the question of validity from that of bindingness in #EUlaw has implications concerning the effects of EU law, as well as its application. The production of legal effects by an EU act (bindingness) is part of the broader assessment of validity.