normy foxyoreos

@foxyoreos
63 Followers
10 Following
1.4K Posts

Tamer alt account for https://gulp.cafe/@foxyoreos where I try my best to keep things more SFW/vanilla. If you're not comfortable interacting with my NSFW account, interact with this one :3

This is also the account you should ping if you're on mastodon.social and want to interact with me (gulp.cafe limits some servers). If you're on mastodon.social and reply to a gulp.cafe post, I won't see it by default.

I still reserve the right to be cringe as fuck UwU

#furry #NSFWArtist

Pronounsthey/them by default, it/its if I know you well
Main account with a lot of smuthttps://gulp.cafe/@foxyoreos
CommissionsOpen, see https://foxyoreos.netlify.app

Damn you Mamdani, do you see the consequences of your actions now?

#vegan

Back to the Atlantic which ends off by reassuring itself that at least we don't have ranked choice voting in our general elections.

They're so fucking scared of progressives. They're so, so fucking scared.

But maybe the research they're publishing is good anyway? I mean, we don't want a form of voting that disenfranchises Black voters, right?

So I'm sure that they have strong evidence to-

Oh look, they're all just talking out of their ass.

Okay, so that's an obvious set of Republican arguments tortured into "no no we totally care about Democrats" framing. But surely they don't have-

Oh fuck they're just Republicans, aren't they?

So let's get that out of the way, this is not a nonpartisan research firm.

So.. this is all basically bad-faith bullshit. I particularly want to call out "what if a ballot harvester has covid" as being an argument they brought up.. in fucking favor of requiring everypony to vote *physically in person*.

Everypony knows you can't catch covid at a polling place. /s

Meanwhile, leave it to the Atlantic to decide that negative campaigns, something that most voters dislike and even most Centrists say they dislike - are actually something we need to protect for.. I don't know why?

"What will candidates run on if not attack ads?"

I don't know, maybe proactive policy? Maybe they'll run on how they'll help the city? The things every voter *wants* them to run on?

The Atlantic fumes about this even as it admits that the strategizing and outcomes are *better*.

Unions and political groups endorsing multiple candidates is *good*. This is decreasing partisanship and increasing cooperation.

And even the Atlantic has to admit: the strategy is simple, not chaotic.

Here are the "Republicans and Democrats need to work together, we're all on the same team" people the *moment* that actual voter coalitions get formed.

But this is the point of ranked choice voting! Different candidates don't need to go scorched earth. They can cooperate.

We're doing election doodles! Let's get Andrew Coumo out for good >:3

Post the following text thread on Bluesky or Mastodon (you can add more if you'd like), link me to it, and then give me a doodle request! <3

#politics #NYCPrimary #furry #FurryArt #ArtGiveaway #vore #VoreArtist

So, if I understand correctly: it's inaccurate to say that Democrats aren't doing anything, and also we should stop calling Democrats because they're the minority and can't do anything.

https://www.axios.com/2025/02/12/democrats-jeffries-move-on-indivisible-trump

#politics #USPol #Democrats

Scoop: Dems "pissed" at liberal groups MoveOn, Indivisible

"I reject and resent the implication that congressional Democrats are simply standing by passively."

Axios