| https://www.linkedin.com/in/marrowpaul/ | |
| ORCID | https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9335-6433 |
| Google Scholar | https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=LquTss4AAAAJ&hl=en |
| https://www.linkedin.com/in/marrowpaul/ | |
| ORCID | https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9335-6433 |
| Google Scholar | https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=LquTss4AAAAJ&hl=en |
I've been using #AnnotatedEquations in my recent papers. I think it really adds to the readability and understanding of the math.
Here are some examples. It uses #tikz in #latex.
Let me know if you like it. Happy for any feedback.
This graphic helps me wrap my head around the magnitude of the problem. Notice the amount of current biomass for wild mammals (in green) versus that for livestock and humans. No wonder we have converging crises of biodiversity, fresh water, and climate. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac083
π¦π: https://twitter.com/WilliamJRipple/status/1592638771216146432
Can I introduce you all to the Davis Downside Dossier (DDD) - maintained by @YorkshireBylines...
In 2016, David Davis infamously said there'd be "no downside to Brexit at all, and considerable upsidesβ.
So the team at Yorkshire #Bylines has kept all the receipts of #Brexit downsides - each item hyperlinked to a press article on an aspect of damage. Currently standing at >800 downsides, it's a rolling tally.
Peruse the DDD here --> https://yorkshirebylines.co.uk/regular-features/the-davis-downside-dossier/
Welcome to Mastodon @rozenberg
The UK's best (and best known) legal commentator