Reminder that Mark Zuckerberg really really really wants you not to read Careless People by Sarah Wynn-Williams.
So, obviously, whatever you do, don't read it or little Mark will get upset.
I'm told having a bio makes you less creepy, so...
Dad, husband (desktop support), engineer.
Mostly harmless.
Joined The Great Resignation in 2021 after 40 or so years in tech. Definitely not one of the "80% who regret their decision" according to Paychex survey 🤔.
Still messing with tech on my own terms, traveling, learning to read, reflecting.
| Verification | https://www.dbrand666.com/about/ |
Reminder that Mark Zuckerberg really really really wants you not to read Careless People by Sarah Wynn-Williams.
So, obviously, whatever you do, don't read it or little Mark will get upset.
Some people think that venture capital is a fundamentally evil business structure. I disagree.
Thought experiment:
If you could press a button tomorrow, that would cause 50% of the entire population of the continent of Africa to die within 5 years😮, but would 50X your profits and create dozens of trillion dollar companies, and help humanity become interplanetary 10 years earlier, would you press it?
If you're on this weird little Mastodon thing reading this, then you are most likely:
1) A technologist of some sort
2) Not a genocidal maniac
So you would of course say no.
Some of you suspect that I'm going to *imply* that many VCs would say yes. But I'm not going to imply anything. I don't have to. Because many of these VCs have written papers and blog posts under their real names, celebrating the fact that they believe that it's wrong *not* to press that button.🤦🏿♂️
The problem with VC is neither the profit motive, nor the business structure.
The problem is that the vast majority of the funds that our entire society uses to solve hard problems, are controlled and allocated by people that believe that it is their duty to create new buttons like the one above, and then mash it repeatedly.
#Via Dante Atkins
@DanteAtkins
2:06 PM · May 8, 2026
"One must fully understand that the Virginia Supreme Court ruling is not simply overruling the voters based on a technicality--it is overruling the voters on a technicality THAT THEY LITERALLY JUST INVENTED FOR THIS PURPOSE AND EXISTS NOWHERE ELSE IN VIRGINIA OR FEDERAL LAW"
Last week I tried to make a donation, via my Fidelity Donor Advised Fund, to the SPLC, which I've donated to previously. Fidelity rejected the transaction.
SPLC is a 501(c)3 charity that is fully eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions. They are the target of a Trump DoJ investigation, but they haven't been found guilty of any crime, and their 501(c)3 status remains valid.
I'll be moving my DAF to one that respects my (lawful) wishes.
SOUTH WINS CIVIL WAR IN OVERTIME!