AKA @chrilson πŸ•πŸ

@chillson
44 Followers
130 Following
109 Posts

I've benefitted a lot from setting up digital silos to keep different kinds of content separate. Separate email apps and browsers for "work" and "personal" stuff, for instance.

This HN post got me thinking that maybe a "content consumption" browser might even be worth considering. All the "to read/watch" tabs in one place, etc. This Basic Attention Token, if well implemented, would complement that approach perfectly I think: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15722299

Brave Expands Basic Attention Token Platform to YouTube | Hacker News

Intensively reasearching, coveting and then purposely NOT buying that fancy gadget is the new blindly buying that fancy gadget

@mdfrg @Are0h Updated FF for Mac and Android just now, but both still have the old design...? Weird.

Guess I'll stick with the Beta version on both platforms for now.

@Are0h @mdfrg I'd like Mozilla a lot more if I could access https://addons.mozilla.org right now...
Add-ons for Firefox (en-US)

Download Firefox extensions and themes. They’re like apps for your browser. They can block annoying ads, protect passwords, change browser appearance, and more.

@Are0h @mdfrg *quietly looks up XUL on Wikipedia*

"What information consumes is rather obvious: it consumes the attention of its recipients... [A] wealth of information creates a poverty of attention."
- Herbert Simon

#TMI πŸ˜“

Being a black coffee drinker is the best.

Milk gone sour? No problem.
Ran out of sugar? Meh, stuff is poison anyway.

Just give me a plain ol' hot cup of bitter burnt bean water and I'm happy.

@Are0h I've been on dat Beta for weeks now, and I have to say, I'm impressed.

I'm no coder, but as a "power user" (gross term I know, but kinda true: lots of specific extensions, multiple profiles, lots of tabs, etc.) who formerly used Chrome almost exclusively, I'm pretty happy with the whole Quantum thing. Way faster than Chrome, super customizable, lots of nice little functional details.

Plus, you know, Mozilla feels (is?) a lot less creepy than Google.

@Stratski @thelovebing Oh crap, good point. I don't have a negative scanner and hadn't thought about buying one tbh.

What about processing? A quick search makes it seem like most typical consumer photo development places (drug stores, etc.) can't handle half-format...

@Stratski I am indeed a bit hesitant about 120 film, yeah. Trying to avoid anything that might end up being a barrier to just getting out and shooting (and then getting the film developed obvs).

Interesting idea with the underwater cam tho. And: wow, nice snap!