Trump caught lying again.
Italy's Meloni says Trump 'totally invented' story that she begged him for photo - https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/meloni-fights-back-after-trump-tells-italian-tv-she-begged-photo-with-him-g7-2026-06-19/
22K likes, 962 comments - conspiracyuniverse_ on May 13, 2026: "They told you it’s just history. They told you anti-Semitism is the real danger. They told you Israel has a right to exist. But what if a former Marine stood up and named the system so clearly that they’ll call him crazy before they admit he’s right? Here’s what they don’t tell you: ✅ The system is lying to us. They don’t want you to question. Why have 110 countries booted the same group over 1,000 times? Because control is the point. Language, media, Hollywood, politicians, weapons, pharma, banks — all owned and dictated. ✅ It’s obvious that behind the scenes, very disturbing things are going on. You have to see behind the fake “good Jew” narrative. To uncover the reality they don’t want to show us — a genocidal state from day one that doesn’t have a right to exist. 💬 Comment JEWS CONTROL EVERYTHING if you know what he was saying. ❤️ Like if you believe the “law of return” is a trap. ↗️ Share this before they call you anti-Semitic for telling the truth. #KenOkeefe #TheyDontWantThisSaid #NoTwoStates #GoyaFight #SystemIsLyin".
217K likes, 5,332 comments - news.crack on March 24, 2026: "'Imminent or Convenient? The Question She Wouldn’t Answer' 🫤 During questioning by Jon Ossoff, Tulsi Gabbard was pressed on whether Iran posed an imminent nuclear threat as previously claimed by Donald Trump. The question itself was narrowly framed and legally significant—focused not on policy, but on whether intelligence assessments supported that claim. Rather than answering directly, Gabbard shifted her response to emphasize that defining an “imminent threat” is ultimately a presidential determination, not solely an intelligence conclusion. From a legal standpoint, this is a classic example of reframing the question to avoid a definitive factual statement. A direct answer would have forced a conflict—either aligning with intelligence assessments that may not support imminence, or validating a political justification for military action. By redirecting to the issue of authority, Gabbard avoided making a statement that could contradict intelligence findings or expose inconsistencies between intelligence and policy decisions. This type of response is often described as jurisdictional deflection—staying technically accurate while sidestepping the core issue. The tension in the exchange reflects a deeper concern: whether there is a gap between what intelligence agencies assess and how that information is presented publicly to justify strategic decisions. That distinction is critical in matters of national security, where the line between analysis and action can carry significant legal and geopolitical consequences. Sources: U.S. Senate hearing footage – Exchange between Tulsi Gabbard and Jon Ossoff PBS NewsHour – Coverage of intelligence assessments on Iran Reuters – Reporting on U.S. claims regarding Iran nuclear threat U.S. intelligence community public statements on Iran nuclear capabilities #newsupdate #world #worldcup #politicalmemes #fypppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp".
Trump caught lying again.
President Donald Trump is crediting his tough immigration policies for a drop in car insurance premiums. He is falsely blaming illegal immigration during his predecessor’s time in the White House for a prior increase. But experts say that increased costs were primarily due to effects from the COVID-19 pandemic, which led to riskier behavior on the roads and supply chain disruptions. Now that insurers are on a better financial footing, they are cutting rates to stay competitive with customers. There is no evidence to suggest that illegal immigration played a significant role in either the rise or the fall of insurance premiums.
And now back to the Epstein files & stay on them.
We're not letting the asshole squirm out from under that.
17K likes, 244 comments - school_of_hard_rox on January 16, 2026: "How often have we been the lemons in someone else’s investment plan? How many systems have we helped sustain that see human need not as a call to care, but as a resource to exploit? “When life gives you lemons, make lemonade” This currently exists in our cultural consciousness as shorthand for resilience or a gentle directive toward optimism in the face of adversity. It’s fundamentally about individual adaptation: you take what circumstances hand you and transform it into something palatable, maybe even sweet. The phrase assumes a certain passivity in the face of fate, suggesting that our power lies not in controlling what happens to us, but in how we respond to it. When Roderick Usher is asked this question, the audience expects some variation on this theme - perhaps a ruthless twist, but still operating within the same basic framework of personal perseverance. Instead, what he delivers is something else entirely. He isn’t lying or even particularly obscuring the truth. He’s just saying out loud what media conglomerates, pharmaceutical companies, and engagement-optimized platforms do every day: identify human suffering, vulnerability, or need, and architect systems to extract maximum value from it. When he looks at widespread adversity and sees market opportunity, when he converts human struggle into profit margins without a flicker of moral consideration, he isn’t demonstrating sociopathy, he’s giving us a glimpse of our current economics as WE have designed it. It crystallizes the show’s exploration of what happens when human connection and moral consideration are completely subordinated to acquisition and power. Roderick doesn’t just make lemonade, he finds a way to corner the entire citrus market. When acquisition and power become the metrics by which we measure success, connection and morality become acceptable losses. And the ugly truth is, the majority will always agree and buy into it. How does that make you feel? Mike Flanagan brilliantly weaves Edgar Allan Poe’s gothic sensibilities into a modern morality tale about the fictional Usher pharmaceutical dynasty. #theuglytruth #socialmania #netflix #pharmaceuticals".
17K likes, 244 comments - school_of_hard_rox on January 16, 2026: "How often have we been the lemons in someone else’s investment plan? How many systems have we helped sustain that see human need not as a call to care, but as a resource to exploit? “When life gives you lemons, make lemonade” This currently exists in our cultural consciousness as shorthand for resilience or a gentle directive toward optimism in the face of adversity. It’s fundamentally about individual adaptation: you take what circumstances hand you and transform it into something palatable, maybe even sweet. The phrase assumes a certain passivity in the face of fate, suggesting that our power lies not in controlling what happens to us, but in how we respond to it. When Roderick Usher is asked this question, the audience expects some variation on this theme - perhaps a ruthless twist, but still operating within the same basic framework of personal perseverance. Instead, what he delivers is something else entirely. He isn’t lying or even particularly obscuring the truth. He’s just saying out loud what media conglomerates, pharmaceutical companies, and engagement-optimized platforms do every day: identify human suffering, vulnerability, or need, and architect systems to extract maximum value from it. When he looks at widespread adversity and sees market opportunity, when he converts human struggle into profit margins without a flicker of moral consideration, he isn’t demonstrating sociopathy, he’s giving us a glimpse of our current economics as WE have designed it. It crystallizes the show’s exploration of what happens when human connection and moral consideration are completely subordinated to acquisition and power. Roderick doesn’t just make lemonade, he finds a way to corner the entire citrus market. When acquisition and power become the metrics by which we measure success, connection and morality become acceptable losses. And the ugly truth is, the majority will always agree and buy into it. How does that make you feel? Mike Flanagan brilliantly weaves Edgar Allan Poe’s gothic sensibilities into a modern morality tale about the fictional Usher pharmaceutical dynasty. #theuglytruth #socialmania #netflix #pharmaceuticals".
37K likes, 1,124 comments - analystnews_ on April 15, 2026: "'Israel and the U.S. are the only countries in the world that bombed six countries in one year.' Journalist Mehdi Hasan fact checks IDF spokesman Doron Spielman on Piers Morgan Uncensored.".
28K likes, 807 comments - kaos_thegod on February 10, 2026: "Organizations like the World Health Organization are unelected, yet hold massive influence over global and national policy. That alone raises a fair question: who benefits and how much does the public actually gain? On paper, these institutions exist to protect public health through coordination, shared data, and global guidance. And when they work as intended, they can save lives. But in reality, funding structures, political pressure, and powerful donors often shape priorities, which leads many to wonder whose interests are truly being served. The issue isn’t expertise, it’s accountability. Guidance quickly becomes mandates, transparency comes late (if at all), and trust erodes when decisions are made about people instead of with them. This isn’t conspiracy. It’s discernment. Questioning unelected power isn’t rejection of science, it’s a demand for clarity, balance, and accountability. Awareness isn’t disobedience. It’s responsibility.".
