| Pronouns | She/Her |
| Inactive | https://twitter.com/ZenDadaist |
fucking spectacaular
microsoft broke replying to email in outlook
Normally I like thunderstorms. However blasting away with accompanying rain at 4am at the start of a heat dome is quite possibly the WORST time to get one.
Not only am I sleep deprived, I'm concerned that this will end up a wet bulb event instead of dry heat which is much more manageable. Joy.
For extra annoyance, while the office has good aircon, the journey for me is a hellcommute under ideal conditions, and will be literally dangerous to my health in this combined heat and humidity.
The cherry on top is that I am still going to have to get to a specific location by tube tomorrow (an even hotter day) to save research project data from poorly-thought-out IT "upgrades".
After Bluesky, Threads, and so on, the whole #WSocial thing is another reminder that it was never about the #Fediverse being "too complicated" or "just for nerds".
A bafflingly large amount of people genuinely only act on a gut feeling telling them that only commercial products with fancy marketing owned by a for-profit corporation can be trustworthy, 'official' and 'legal', for the lack of a better word.
If something is a commercial offering by a competent-looking, rich family man in a suit, it's clearly an official, legal, trustworthy product. You can be proud of using such a fancy-looking service.
When they see a community-run open-source project or a grassroots initiative, their first instinct is that it must be shady, illegal, complicated, broken or predatory in some way. It's probably some aftermarket grey area bootleg made by weird tech nerds, political groups with an ulterior motive, conspiracy theorists or some naive teenage hackers. They'd also be embarrassed for using it in front of their peers and neighbours; who uses some free back-alley software, are you poor or something?
The same people are the reason why Google is using the word 'sideloading', why scammers love wearing fancy suits, why people suddenly act childishly helpless in front of LibreOffice, or why DIY HRT is so demonised.
They trust any kind of 'official approval' over their own senses. If someone does something that isn't 'approved', they're a bad person or clearly endangering themselves and others. No idea why exactly, but psh, it must be wrong somehow, or everyone would do it, right?
If people on the Fediverse understood that the whole "it's all so complicated and clunky" thing is just a thinly veiled excuse for a general disdain for non-commercial software, we could finally stop making all our software imitate their corporate equivalents in a futile attempt to appease people who never gave us a chance in the first place.
You'll never convince them to treat it in good faith no matter how much effort or money you put into UX or 'ease of use'. All you're doing is making the software worse, e. g. through things like dot-social, verified accounts or begging brands, corporations and politicians to join and give your product some kind of 'official' validation.
Viss
MassivelyOP
Not The LBC Guy
Eric Alper
lia