1,018 Followers
646 Following
98 Posts

Autonomy and liberation without concession.

Transphobia is patriarchy, Marxism-Leninism is spicy liberalism, analysis is not advocacy, I have no patience for boneheaded contrarianism.

WARNING: I am extremely sparing with the Content Warning feature. I use it pretty much exclusively for the most graphic things and as required by moderators. I have firsthand experience that CWs lead to people who would like to read things not seeing them and have found the overall effect to be mostly negative. I discuss politics, bodily autonomy issues, queer issues, and all sorts of difficult, messy, sometimes depressing but important topics. I do not believe that these topics should be censored. There are no hard feelings whatsoever if you would prefer to mute or block me to not see my content. I will always give consideration to requests to CW something but in the majority of cases will not do so.

PronounsShe/her

Anarchists among immigrants provide a strong intellectual, cultural, and organizational infusion to American anarchism and American labor organizing more broadly. Anarchists made a point of organizing among and with every kind of person on all kinds of issues. Anarchist newspapers in German, Czech, Yiddish, and more circulated broadly. In fact, the depiction of anarchist as bearded bomb-throwers likely stems from anti-worker newspapers depicting Johann Most, a German anarchist and polemicist who was so influential in US politics that his visage became the icon of anarchism for generations of liberal critics.

As worker exploitation became more savage, anarchists were increasingly the people most willing to directly resist exploitation. Throughout the 1870s, workers in general found their efforts for labor relief frustrated at every turn. Strikes were met with incredible violence from private security and the police alike, worker parades and demonstrations faced threats from business owners and court challenges (the first gun control law in the US that went to the Supreme Court was a law restricting the right of working people to form community defense groups with longarms), and voting efforts were defeated by political machines or enacted only toothless laws. Anarchists, with their willingness to engage in direct confrontation, became more appealing than the moderates to many workers: when moderate means are getting you killed the radicals make a lot of sense.

In the early 1880s, union workers pushed their unions to convene meetings to push towards a general strike for an 8 hour work day. May 1st 1886 was picked, giving organizers a couple years to prepare. While many anarchists were initially skeptical it became clear that there was massive support among working people, and anarchists quickly moved to organize for the fight that was wanted. After all, anarchists don't believe in lording over people, so even if the 8 hour day sounded too modest to many anarchists, who were they to tell their fellow workers to pick a different fight?

Throughout the 1860s and 70s states and municipalities pass 8 hour workday laws, but they're largely unenforceable in the face of the increasingly concentrated power of the capitalists. Throughout the US workers organize for their mutual aid and protection, and the bosses respond with security crackdowns, harsher worker conditions, and more union busting. In business districts the small business owners frequently form their own militias to shoot at protesting or parading workers. The Know-Nothings move from a secret society of racist anti-immigration zealots to an important bloc in formal politics. Meanwhile, unions in the US West refuse to organize with Chinese workers, dividing worker power. In the East, unions often refuse to organize with the Irish and Germans. Across all of the US, Black workers are excluded from unions. Even the Marxist International Workingmen's Association splits worker power by insisting that women's struggles be secondary.

In this backdrop, anarchism comes to the fore in American organizing.

Tech entrepreneurs run roughshod over their workers to churn out technologies to deskill and displace other workers. Across the nation labor laws stand as increasingly dead letters while forced overtime and gigwork leads to 12-16 hour work days 6-7 days a week. Right-wing paramilitary groups and lone gunmen menace US cities, threatening immigrants and shooting people in "defense" of property. Anti-immigrant sentiment is used as a wedge to expand surveillance and control by the state, with businesses and even churches in many states coming under attack for not aligning with reactionary causes.

It's the mid 1800s, and the fight for the 8 hour work day is heating up.

I'm mesmerized by the Bluesky libs who simultaneously believe that Trump is destroying the economy but also that voters are mistaken about the economy being bad
Honestly I'm not even mad at anyone for being skeptical of politicians and afraid they might govern to the right of how they ran, that's basically always rational. But Fetterman is such a rare case that any comparison is hollow. Compare people to Sinema or Gabbard, or maybe Lieberman or Manchin, depending on the specific comparison you're looking for. But Fetterman literally blew up his own career basically immediately on election, after suffering very clearly personality altering medical problems. You're probably not worried that the politician you're talking about is going to have a stroke and flame out in a single term, you're probably worried that they're lying about being progressive (Sinema, Gabbard) or will be the de facto rotating villain for potentially years (Manchin, Lieberman).
Guy who's only engagement with politics is reading about John Fetterman seeing a second politician: I'm really worried about the Fetterman vibes from this guy
Modern US liberalism is really starved for any analysis of power, so the voices that are actually interested in that analysis stand out. Sam Seder's arguments for the merit of confiscatory taxation as a democratizing mechanism is another firmly liberal critique of power that's still useful to the left. Bouie's arguments for breaking the power of the Supreme Court that he's been making recently are deeply rooted in the tradition of liberal republicanism, and it's also a sharp critique of how power accumulation is the disease and the bad legal decisions are a symptom. His observation that merely remaking the court in a way that would produce his preferred decisions but changing nothing else would be insufficient is valuable.
Jamelle Bouie is probably one of the sharpest liberal commentators in the US that is specifically focused on liberal critiques of power. His politics aren't mine, but he stands as an impressive thinker and communicator who is deeply rooted in liberatory traditions of liberalism/republicanism. I think if you're on the left and you want to get better at talking to liberals, Bouie is a really great resource for finding common ground that can actually be productive without needing to "compromise" to the right.

The spirit of May Day is fundamentally anarchist and it can never be otherwise. It is a reminder that the working class is made up of every race, creed, and gender, that we must organize among and with every kind of people, and that the power of the working class is found in the struggles that workers take up for themselves. No union boss, no vanguard party, no politician, can impose their will on the workers; to be a working class leader is to be part of the struggle of your fellow workers, receptive to them, willing to take on fights alongside them in solidarity because those are the fights they are inspired to. To be a labor militant is to agitate and educate and take on more work, but it also must be to include and involve and uplift and share the burdens. The 8 hour work day wasn't a fight that was chosen by a communist vanguard or by union bosses from on high or even by influential anarchist leaders; the reason that anarchists died for the 8 hour work day is because we were enmeshed in the broader labor struggle and we found that workers were spoiling for a fight, and we set to work alongside our fellows. No party or organization or enlightened caste can ever stand above the working people to guide them from on high and build a lasting labor peace.

It is a subterranean fire. It cannot be put out.

Personally as an anarchist I'm making an effort to get out there more, to challenge preconceptions abiut anarchism, and to challenge narratives that treat anarchism as historically marginal or unimportant. Throughout most of the history of socialism, anarchism has been the most prominent tendency across a bunch of different times and places. Specifically in Chicago in the mid to late 1800s, anarchism was massively more popular and influential than other forms of socialism. There were openly anarchist unions. Anarchist social events filled parks and beerhalls. The anarchist yearly commemoration of the Paris Commune was so popular that multiple buildings had to be rented for the day's events. Anarchist labor organizing, with its radically egalitarian principles, eventually became part of the bedrock model of labor organizing.