This is a many-years study, started by Marleen Van Loenen, continued by Rosa de Groot, and now analysed and written up by Suzanne Castenmiller and Nandhini Kanagasabesan, w supported by Aurélie Guislain and Benoit Nicolet, PhD

Great collaboration with the medical team from the AvL-NKI, with
Koen Hartemink, Kim Monkhorst, Alexander Veenhof, Egbert Smit en John Haanen

Supported by Sanquin Blood Supply Foundation funding and Oncode Institute

@TatianaIlyina

I refuse to accept when it hits family life. Does it hurt my career? Don't think so. And if it does? Well, bad luck. They cannot complain about too few children in our society while making it impossible for women to combine work with family life. I must add: i was blessed with understanding colleagues. But culture changes from within. I also strongly believe it is important to show the next generation that a job does not mean sacrificing everything.

@cyrilpedia

Not sure i am happy with this. In the NL we already have this in place. Does it really help? I think

1) evaluation highly (and too much) depends on the writing style (not so much on the achievements themselves). And this type of writing TMO does not necessarily reflect how good a researcher is.

2) is even more difficult for the reviewer to extract the prime evaluation points

TMO a list would also allow to include non-classical achievements, parts of contribution, etc.
#ERC