Does anyone have a handy resource on submission deadlines and word count limits for spring law journal submissions (especially online law journals)? Or does everyone just search the old fashioned way?
Jordan Francis
@Jord_Fran
- 33 Followers
- 47 Following
- 10 Posts
Policy Counsel at Future of Privacy Forum. JD, CIPP/US, CIPP/E, CIPM. He/Him. Views are my own. Twitter: @Jord_Fran. Bluesky: @Jord_Fran.bsky.social
Reading my local library's year-in-review has me thinking about how public libraries are arguably the greatest institution in human history. What a powerful commitment to the common good and the pursuit of knowledge.
https://www.hclib.org/about/news/2022/December/most-borrowed-books-of-2022
https://www.hclib.org/about/news/2022/December/most-borrowed-books-of-2022
Holiday bliss: sitting in a cozy chair, sipping coffee, and reading an IAPP white paper. I am truly in holiday mode.
http://ow.ly/UaPh50M9zQn
http://ow.ly/UaPh50M9zQn
Predatory monetization in video games has been a problem for years and there's now a body of research demonstrating how these practices harm children specifically. It's reassuring to see the FTC take a stand here against privacy-invasive default settings and deceptive interfaces.
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2022/12/fortnite-video-game-maker-epic-games-pay-more-half-billion-dollars-over-ftc-allegations
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2022/12/fortnite-video-game-maker-epic-games-pay-more-half-billion-dollars-over-ftc-allegations
Fortnite Video Game Maker Epic Games to Pay More Than Half a Billion Dollars over FTC Allegations of Privacy Violations and Unwanted Charges
The Federal Trade Commission has secured agreements requiring Epic Games, Inc., creator of the popular video game Fortnite, to pay a total of $520 million in relief over allegations the company vio
ground its future data privacy rules in concepts of trust, loyalty and relational vulnerability. Drafting these comments was my first project as a new lawyer, and I can't imagine a more enjoyable or fulfilling project to be trusted with. Our full comments are available at https://regulations.gov/comment/FTC-2022-0053-1071
A shortened version without the appendix is available on SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4284020 [2/2]
A shortened version without the appendix is available on SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4284020 [2/2]
Last month, Neil Richards, @hartzog, and I submitted comments in response to the FTC's ANPR on commercial surveillance. Our comments urge the Commission to promulgate substantive rules which will foster trust in digital markets and enable human flourishing. Our comments are organized around 3 main arguments: (1) commercial surveillance is the correct label for the data practices we observe in the market; (2) notice and choice has failed as a regulatory regime; and (3) the Commission should [1/2]
With the Minnesota DFL taking the state senate and now holding a trifecta, I'm curious whether we will see progress on a state privacy bill in 2023. I haven't heard anything since the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act was proposed in 2021, but the conditions seem right.
During a flight delay yesterday I sat at an airport bar and (inadvertently) overhead strangers tell each other their entire life story, including everywhere they have lived, where they went to college, their career, dating history, etc. It's such a neat example of Alan Westin's concept of anonymity as a state of privacy.
If anyone has suggestions for an easy way to cross post between Twitter and Mastodon please share. Maybe eventually I'll start organically using this site more, but for now I'll be manually reposting the content from my Twitter.