Christos Argyropoulos MD, PhD

@ChristosArgyrop@mstdn.science
509 Followers
304 Following
2K Posts

Division Chief, Nephrology, University of New Mexico
Posts:
Data Science, Bioinformatics, Computing, Statistics

#RNAsequencing #Nanopore
#GLMMs #Rstats #Bayesian
#Perl #HPC #Statistics #BigData
#fedi22 #Rstats #Clang

Redditu/ReplacementSlight413
BlueSkyhttps://bsky.app/profile/christosargyrop.bsky.social
Google Scholarhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=Hj15fvUAAAAJ&hl=en
Github Profilehttps://github.com/chrisarg

This #infosec #medtech post is nuts. The FDA should really regulate medical devices, not pretend that it does

https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/s/oQ9s2KQfZd

➡️ kernel 3.18 / Android Marshmallow EOL 7 years ago ie no security updates

☠️ form of partition verification at all 🔜 upload kill codes

It is this time of the year to invoke

cpanm-outdated | cpanm

and update all #perl modules in one go!

I am afraid that Elon and Zuckerberg cooked themselves in when they allied with certain interest groups and #enshitified their product in the quest for ad money. #Facebook will start limiting links too for professional accounts trying to keep people on a platform that is dying from scamming, reels and AI slop. History of business is not going to be kind to those who destroyed global agoras for ephemeral gains.

the unpleasantness is now at a minimum (especially if one resists the urgency to feed the trolls).

Effectively #twitter / #X is now back to functioning as a microblogging platform for many people worth following.

But if one is using X for microblogging, why not #fediverse (longer posts for free) ? When #WordPress fully integrates with #ActivityPub, one can monetize on WordPress and distribute via the Fediverse (and get the interactions in a moderated environment).

Some further thoughts about the reappearance of chronological ordering of posts in #twitter / #X

First an observation: I am seeing that people in the sciences use X for tweetorials/threads and mostly limit interactions outside their field (except when something really far out originates within our admin). The trolls will ofc resurface when one posts something popular that the PTB dislike (whether it is #ai , #covid , #climatechange, #vaccines). Nevertheless, since engagement is down ....

Perl Advent Calendar 2025 - How SUSE is Using Perl https://perladvent.org/2025/2025-12-20.html

#Perl #PerlAdventCalendar

Perl Advent Calendar 2025 - How SUSE is Using Perl

Share your GitHub profile.
Let’s check em’ all.

Interesting paper by @irisvanrooijcogsci.com (h/t @sunstarsys on X ) about #AI

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42113-024-00217-5

Proves the Ingenia Theorem, which basically brackets the AI learning problem as NP hard.

NP hard means that one needs exponentially growing resources to learn more and more things.

At some point one runs out of atoms of the universe to do such scaling and this happens at the level of everyday problems we would like to delegate to AI.

Scaling is a chimera. Let's stop wasting resources

Reclaiming AI as a Theoretical Tool for Cognitive Science - Computational Brain & Behavior

The idea that human cognition is, or can be understood as, a form of computation is a useful conceptual tool for cognitive science. It was a foundational assumption during the birth of cognitive science as a multidisciplinary field, with Artificial Intelligence (AI) as one of its contributing fields. One conception of AI in this context is as a provider of computational tools (frameworks, concepts, formalisms, models, proofs, simulations, etc.) that support theory building in cognitive science. The contemporary field of AI, however, has taken the theoretical possibility of explaining human cognition as a form of computation to imply the practical feasibility of realising human(-like or -level) cognition in factual computational systems, and the field frames this realisation as a short-term inevitability. Yet, as we formally prove herein, creating systems with human(-like or -level) cognition is intrinsically computationally intractable. This means that any factual AI systems created in the short-run are at best decoys. When we think these systems capture something deep about ourselves and our thinking, we induce distorted and impoverished images of ourselves and our cognition. In other words, AI in current practice is deteriorating our theoretical understanding of cognition rather than advancing and enhancing it. The situation could be remediated by releasing the grip of the currently dominant view on AI and by returning to the idea of AI as a theoretical tool for cognitive science. In reclaiming this older idea of AI, however, it is important not to repeat conceptual mistakes of the past (and present) that brought us to where we are today.

SpringerLink

Hey @ChristosArgyrop, that sounds well within the capabilities of Rex, and what one may implement with it! 👍

If you have questions or concerns, contact me, or ask the community via our support channels: https://www.rexify.org/support/index.html

Feeling curious about your Armbian experience – we may need to teach Rex to manage it like Debian 🤔

Likely a similar change when we added Raspbian support: https://github.com/RexOps/Rex/commit/2106467d574f74d622d2856c7e6901ca618b098c

Excited to hear more about your use case and experience!

Until then, happy hacking!

Support for Rex