MANITOBA. TODAY.
THIS IS THE COST OF CLIMATE CHANGE.
THIS IS THE NEW ABNORMAL.
GET OFF YOUR ASS AND JOIN THE FIGHT
MANITOBA. TODAY.
THIS IS THE COST OF CLIMATE CHANGE.
THIS IS THE NEW ABNORMAL.
GET OFF YOUR ASS AND JOIN THE FIGHT
Stack Overflow's deal with "Open"AI is prompting the site's contributors to remove their posts and close their accounts. Good for them.
The "AI" cartel is telling the people who created and populated the open web that they were suckers.
😳 A suspected intruder was arrested early Sunday morning after a break-in at the home of Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, according to police.
Three wins just now:
— The House has advanced the Ukraine aid package with votes 165 (D) to 151 (R).
— Marjorie Taylor Greene has left the House in anger.
— Final vote tomorrow.
We are getting there!
how can one not stan Letitia James?
also, Mike Luckovich is right up there with Canada's Michael de Adder as one of the most talented realistic cartoonist in North America.
“Because here is real danger in what Katie Britt did. And I want to take a moment and sit in the danger and talk about the fact that she weaponized someone's story, not to actually get something done, not to make someone's life better, but to score political points. It's just about the ugliest thing you can do in American politics.” — Alicia Menendez, on MSNBC’s The Weekend.
I get my news from print media because in print I am better able to skip the hype and opinions.
Also, in print, I can spot when a headline is misleading.
I have never gotten news from TV or cable. I don't like those talking heads.
On election night, I am generally working (I do voter protection work) but I watch the numbers and figure out which districts are reporting first.
I tried once to listen to the elections pundits and after 10 minutes I wanted to throw something at the TV.
10
A wild read: "The most alarming of the intercepts revealed that one of the most senior Russian military commanders was explicitly discussing the logistics of detonating a weapon on the battlefield."
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/09/us/politics/biden-nuclear-russia-ukraine.html
"... soon the C.I.A. was warning that, under a singular scenario in which Ukrainian forces decimated Russian defensive lines and looked as if they might try to retake Crimea — a possibility that seemed imaginable that fall — the likelihood of nuclear use might rise to 50 percent or even higher."
“The more successful the Ukrainians are at ousting the Russian invasion, the more likely Putin is to threaten to use a bomb — or reach for it.”
"Administration officials said that the United States’ countermove would have to be nonnuclear. But they quickly added that there would have to be some kind of dramatic reaction."