RT @[email protected]
The more we get sucked into these parliamentary "debates" and their reproduction of fatalist dead-end disappointments where nothing can change, the less open we become to the possibility of transformation in the everyday. What we need is abandon, is negation, is antagonism.
🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/waresinfoshop/status/1590355085657133061
wares infoshop library (now on kolektiva.social) on Twitter
“The more we get sucked into these parliamentary "debates" and their reproduction of fatalist dead-end disappointments where nothing can change, the less open we become to the possibility of transformation in the everyday. What we need is abandon, is negation, is antagonism.”
TwitterIt is claimed that “Bandilang Itim” doesn't do anything but talk shit. “Bandilang Itim” is a distro, not an organization; distros talk shit all the time. We, as anarchists and abolitionists, do things, but we don't do things as “Bandilang Itim.” Hope this clarifies.
Some Anarchists from the Central European Region wrote "Anarchist Antimilitarism and Myths About the War in Ukraine" and it's an important text on combating militarism in the region. No war but war on war!
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/anonymous-anarchist-antimilitarism-and-myths-about-the-war-in-ukraine
Anarchist Antimilitarism and Myths About the War in Ukraine
Some Anarchists from the Central European Region Anarchist Antimilitarism and Myths About the War in Ukraine September 2022 Source in Czech:...
The Anarchist LibraryRT @[email protected]
Left Electoralism, Fascist Direct Action, and Anti-Fascist Resistance
https://crimethinc.com/BrazilElection2022
The clashes over the 2022 elections in Brazil offer a glimpse of a future in which the far right reorganizes while the institutional left continues to bet on a collapsing social order.
🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/crimethinc/status/1589396960305303552
If we really desire a free society, our means have to unite with our ends, taking care that the means can are becoming the ends. We invite you to also practice this dialectic of becoming in other examples. What other seeds do you see, and what do you think it can grow into? 12/12
How about Lula? By virtue of using state power, PT turned hierarchical. What could Lula/PT become? They won through mass mobilizations that empowered a representation in Lula. This can only become the entrenchment of representative rule, the state, not popular power. 11/12
When we speak of Bongbong Marcos, who used stolen money to buy consent through social media ads, what could that become? It can only become a society which is ruled by spectacle and lies. It prefigures a sophisticated dictatorship based on misinformation 10/12
When we speak of the Communist Party of the Philippines whose central committee decides everything and only uses congresses for rubber stamping—what could this become/prefigure? Why it only can become/prefigure a one-party dictatorship. 9/12
When we speak of free association, direct action, transformative justice, and consensual decisions, what could these means become? Why, they become/prefigure a free society that deals with harm and decision-making in a productive way. 8/12