I wind up with kind of the opposite reaction: At that point, why not rather get a bakfiets, or even just a shopping bag on wheels to bring on the tram?
But I guess my perspective is influenced by not having owned a car for over a decade, and instead renting a van for bulky stuff and "normal" cars for trips w/friends/family a couple of times a year.
@devlord There is a very small Airstream, made of fibreglass instead of steel -- Bantam? Forget the name now. Possibly not made anymore. I know I considered it for use with a Wrangler. I've heard very different numbers for MINI's towing capacity, from zero to a tonne; I'd ask a dealer, directly. And if you do it, have the dealer put the tow package in, not some sketchy after-market job.
There used to be trailers made for Bugs, so I'm sure it's possible.
@devlord Bambi.
https://www.airstream.com/travel-trailers/bambi/
4.9-6.7 m long, 2.44 m wide, 2.88 m tall (w/ AC); single axle; GVWR = 1.588t
So, not for all vehicles, unfortunately. And not for MINI. The tongue weight alone is probably a deal-breaker.
But plenty of other trailers are light enough.
There is a genuine need for safety. Therefore this gadget is officially not a car.
However it would fit for most needs, and together with an appropriate speed limit in urban areas it is definitively an alternative to the monster trucks.
This is true, but I'm not sure that safety would be so much of an issue if everyone drove one.
Driving one of these on roads with SUVs driving alongside would be terrifying.
Completely agree.
Most of the safety problems associated with small cars have nothing to do with small cars so much as the presence of bigger cars, just as the safety problems associated with bicycles and pedestrians are due to the presence of any cars.
Yes. As soon as you do not walk but steer a vehicle, like scooter, bike or car/bus, you become a possible deadly threat to others.
That vertical line under the door makes me wonder if there's an option to flip a few levers and turn a wheel and expand it into a four/six/eight-seater, like my old dining table.
But I guess once you've got the tractor unit, you could always add a passenger carriage or two at need.
@electropict @davidho If I recall correctly, the vertical line under the door is because the car's body is essentially made from two sets of identical panels. The front and back halves are the same.
(Also I think it's not even a "car", by law, it's like... a car-shaped scooter that a 14-year-old can drive).
If I lived in a city, and that city had efficient, functional public transport I probably wouldn't have a car to begin with.
@davidho As a very tall person (6'8"), I was going to disagree, but having looked closer at the car, I think I'd fit brilliantly in that, so I agree entirely!
That genuinely looks like a car I could fit comfortably in, which is not something I can say about pretty much every other car out there.
@TidalFlats @davidho One, or two if you can train one of them to drive it.
I'm 6'2" and am comfortable in one of these. In Italy (and probably elsewhere in the EC) it's a car you can drive before age 18. Top speed is 45 MPH, I think.
How many retrievers can carry it?
@TidalFlats @davidho La Signora Quarantanova bought her daughter in Milano a new Panda in 2006 and it's still going strong, no real difficulties.
That Topolino is a re-badged CitroΓ«n Ami, and has many econo features, such as identical front and rear fascias, driver and passenger doors. Like the 2CV, the seats are lawn chairs. The external "paint" is really just the color of the molded plastic.
There was an old Fiat 500-cc Topolino, of which almost half a million were made, 1936-55.

@davidho @sdarlington Thereβs a taxi driver in the new film, You, Me & Tuscany who taxis in one of those π
See https://m.imdb.com/title/tt36352591/mediaviewer/rm3842036738/