Note to anyone who buys art from an artist: DO NOT EVER RUN THE ART THROUGH AN AI-PROGRAM! It will change details and destroy the art AND feeds that art into the program to be stolen over and over again!

To do this is to allow the theft of the artist's work.

Sincerely: Artist whose map just got absolutely ruined by AI "filter" and is shared in instagram with all the million mistakes that makes my skills look absolute shit. Plus the theft thing.

I am so so sad.

#art #fantasymaps

@hiisikoloart @emilyenco im not sure this is completely true LLMs are not "always learning" like they love to try pretend they are, they have a fixed set of training data and they have to put out a new AI afterwards with new training data, the process of training takes ages and a shitload of computing power .. though wouldnt surprise me if they use their own users prompts for that because they dont care about privacy or people or consent so ..
@Li @hiisikoloart @emilyenco Doesn't change the fact that it would get stolen and added to the training data.
@theartlav @hiisikoloart @emilyenco i mean i said that "it wouldnt surprise me if they use their own user prompts" the groups that have no problem crashing independant websites using overzealous scraping and evading all attempts to block them .. and using their shit to help murder people i doubt have an issue using their own user prompts as training data for their next version of their ai? i just wanted to clarify on it a bit

@Li @hiisikoloart @emilyenco depends. Online services will generally scrape it for later. Offline services on your personal GPU report nothing to nobody, but they also aren’t generally used by the clueless the way online services are.

Regardless, post-processing someone’s art and then sharing it is pretty appalling behavior.