Yenn dc ☂️RE: https://mstdn.social/@sensiblequiet/116361490052934697
Wait, WHAT.?!
An environmentalist organization looking for an “AI lead”..?
Bloody fuck…
I knew Greenpeace's top is pretty heavily corporatized, but THIS much?
Maaaybe it's possible to define ethical use as no use—
> You'll have: proven success implementing enterprise data and AI governance frameworks.
> How Success is Measured: Lead implementation and responsible adoption of out-of-the-box AI capabilities within enterprise platforms.
Ah. Nope.
Use is mandatory.
And ethics or sustainability for the AI providers completely optional, to boot. 🤦♀️
Bonus:
> You'll have: Strong understanding of responsible AI principles, AI governance, and platform-embedded AI capabilities. A strong interest in how data and AI can power environmental and social impact.
… if they ACTUALLY understood this they won't be taking the frigging job, dammit. 😭
> How Success is Measured: Ensure data and AI platforms comply with privacy, security, and regulatory obligations.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
This bubble cannot explode soon enough.
-
Job offer and referenced guidelines from Greenpeace Asia–Pacific in particular (which is… not a little region).
Does NOT bode well for the rest of the organization though.
PS: yes, this DOES explicitly include genAI tools; there's not even the "not all AI is genAI" “excuse” here…