Is #mastodon becoming an echo chamber? This post from @carnage4life has me questioning our community. The Mastodon team is finally getting some traction, the product improvements are increasing, The #UX is improving, yet people posting on multiple platforms are making comments like this. It's confusing.

I *know* people here don't want this to be a classic social media-clone but we'd *like* journalists to be here right? They aren't coming with examples like this!

@scottjenson so, I find this discussion disappointing for a few reasons.

The biggest one is this: all three platforms that @carnage4life calls out are connected via ActivityPub. They are on one inter-network.

In theory, he should not need three different accounts, with three different follower groups. He should have one account, and all 103k followers (minus duplicates!) could be part of the same conversation, on whatever server platform they use.

In practice, few people do this today.

@scottjenson

As technologists we need to do more to smooth those junctures and make them less of a barrier. I hope in a few years when @carnage4life looks at his network, it feels more integrated and less separated.

@scottjenson @carnage4life on the topic of AI, I find the abusive conversations on the Fediverse pretty dispiriting. People I like and respect have worked themselves into the position that use of AI is an inexcusable sin, and that anyone who uses AI merits harassment and abuse. Given that 85% of developers use or plan to use AI (Stack Overflow poll), that means a huge number of tech people getting brigaded by our anti-AI squad.

@scottjenson @carnage4life I've tried to mitigate that a bit by sharing my own experience with AI as a development tool. I know there are other people on the Fediverse who talk about how and when they use AI, with or without misgivings.

https://cosocial.ca/@evan/116206693774408287

Evan Prodromou (@[email protected])

I use Claude and Thaura for search in my daily life. I use Claude as a rubber duck for coding. I also let it review my code for errors or make recommendations. On occasion, I'll let CoPilot or Claude add a few lines of code directly. I don't "vibe code". I enjoy both uses. I don't feel guilty about either.

CoSocial

@scottjenson @carnage4life I've been privately sharing this link to a post by @MozillaAI , an Open Source non-profit announcing an Open Source AI project to make development with AI safer, more efficient, and less costly. They got brigaded in a pretty threatening way, and people I know and respect jumped in to join the dogpile.

https://mastodon.social/@MozillaAI/116279201448628866

@evan @scottjenson @MozillaAI Mastodon as a community is quite hostile to AI and anything that isn’t a criticism of AI is viewed with skepticism at best and typically with hostility as the default.

It’s unfortunate because, as in your Mozilla example, there is still time to shape how AI is used in our industry. It’s better to engage and try to influence it versus stick your head in the sand and have the change thrusted upon you.

@carnage4life @scottjenson @MozillaAI well, bless their hearts for posting through it. There are some more troubling threads in their stream, especially when they highlight team members.

@evan @carnage4life @scottjenson @MozillaAI

It is unfortunately very easy to convince yourself that abuse and harrassment are OK as long as they're in service of a morally just cause.

@shauna @evan @carnage4life @scottjenson @MozillaAI It's also very easy to convince yourself that strongly opposing harmful things is the same as abuse and harassment if you are defending a morally unjust system.

Tech bros promoting harmful technology are not victims just because they are being challenged.

@reflex @shauna @evan

THIS. The harassment comes from a position of moral authority. They are doing it for the good of the system. If they are aware enough to know it's harassment, "it's worth it"

@scottjenson @shauna @evan I think you misread me. Your take was wildly incorrect and your lack of learning from it has been interesting. AI is incredibly harmful objectively, with virtually no benefits in the way it is being marketed. Mozilla is using their enormous financial position to promote this harm, and people are complaining that the community is attempting to hold them to account.

It's not harassment, it's legitimate feedback, even if at times angry.

@reflex @shauna @evan

My point was NEVER to support or endorse AI. I was using it as an example of how 'different topics' are met with hostility here.

People feel VERY strongly about AI. There are clearly horrible things being done. That discussion should happen and I'm not opposed to it.

I just wanted us to be be a *little* more tolerant of *some* ideas but this has clearly spiraled into something far too big for there to be a meaningful conversation at this point.

@scottjenson @shauna @evan Your thread attracted AI justifiers, and you used some really poor comparisons. I also feel it's denigrating the legitimate and non-emotional objections to a harmful technology to refer to people as "feeling" strongly about it rather than acknowledging that people call out issues consistently here rather than letting them get swept under the rug and 'moved on from' as they are in other spaces.

@scottjenson @shauna @evan The problem AI promoters are having here is that the old tactic of not addressing the legitimate problems and simply repeating that something is inevitable while recruiting 'trusted authorities' like Evan here is not working on the one social media network that is not driven by manipulative algorithms.

Rather than recognize that the concerns are legitimate, they are categorizing them as harassment in an attempt to bypass the brick wall they hit.