@ketan Suppression into ignorant subservience, serving the ultimate abusers at the top 1%.

@ketan what's interesting about the paper (having read the abstract and the conclusions, and skimmed the methodology) is that they're *very* keen to insist that they're not being *negative* about cognitive surrender, merely noting that it exists. The question is: why would you not be negative about it? What can we say about the authors that they feel the need to hedge ethically on this observed phenomenon?

@ketan
i&i would say
"cognitive surrender" leads AI *leaders AND users* to abandon logical thinking" `w;7[)
#prpXprpgnd

@ketan fascinating. But now I have to go figure out what “Fluid IQ” is, because that seems important. I’m pretty skeptical of anything that uses “IQ” in its name, but I don’t want to jump to conclusions.