War crimes Tuesday!
25th amendment isn't real & will never be invoked, proved when Reagan was allowed to stay in office with dementia
according to what i heard, what they had instead in Reagan's era was a 2nd guy with a 2nd nuclear suitcase & if the guy didn't turn his key, there could be no nuclear war, that's likely the only reason there's still a world since Reagan was another who thought he was in a movie
i just hope we still have that 2nd guy to hold the line aga. a madman's first strike ?
That guys name was Nancy
i heard it was a guy in the military at not even the level of a general & not a name any of us would know... but i think nancy's astrologer certainly ruled the country at a lot of levels...
thought has crossed my mind
in Reagan's day, apparently it wasn't so easy for the POTUS to fire random military officers but Congress is sitting back & letting the POTUS do it on the daily because they're in on the grift
the current military (since at least W Bush) is full of cowards happy to do any war crime or shrug & just take a pension & let their country be destroyed
disgraceful behavior on all sides from everyone in a position of power
This was my immediate reaction, way too direct
@Strandjunker Sadly, there's a strong case for this administration in purposefully disrupting vital infrastructure, in order to profit more till the next administration.
Nepotism wealth combined with charisma, and a pulpit like Art of the Deal and far reaching tv series, has led to one of the most abusive power paradigms, in human history. It's time for complete replacement.
@[email protected] we take opposite definitions of charisma I have identified. how interesting!
mine is:
an appealling personality whose charm is clearly evident in ones actions and words.
and not
a sociopath who uses the tools of populism to manipulate cowards to extreme violence.
How much of his base really likes this? I know they like it when it's about familiar American racism or sexism... but when it's a war on the other side of the world I think a lot of people who might like the bluster in other contexts aren't on board with this at all.
Yes, even the army families, really especially the army families.
@futurebird
No one is on Truth Social but a handful of journalists, Trump, and a few hundred sycophants. Even his admin still just uses Twitter.
TS is just Trump’s random screaming pillow and a weird ticker that journos farm for content.
@Strandjunker If this won't be a warning tale to never ever again have republicans in power, then I don't know what will be.
Then again when there will be prosperity for enough years people will want some fucked up shit and will elect a republican again. It has already happened how many times so far?
I mean, what is this even? Him mentioning Allah… that’s got to be a blasphemy somewhere
@GhostOnTheHalfShell Tell all his Christian Supremacist followers that he was just seen praising Allah.
@GhostOnTheHalfShell The last person in the room told him silly stereotypes about all Muslims being religiously loyal to their caliph?
Image description:
Truth Social post from Donald J. Trump: "Tuesday will be Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day, all wrapped up in one, in Iran. There will be nothing like it!!! Open the Fuckin' Strait, you crazy bastards, or you'll be living in Hell - JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah. President DONALD J. TRUMP."
Time stamp: April 5, 2026, 8:03 AM.
FYI, I looked on Truth Social and this post appears legit.
@Strandjunker - to say nothing of The International Criminal Court, which is tasked with prosecuting war crimes, which all of this blatantly is, "when national courts are unwilling or unable to prosecute", which is clearly the case.
Seriously, the ICC has jurisdiction to prosecute Trump & Co. for so many things, including rape & enforced disappearance, not to mention genocide, so Israel should also be in its crosshairs - what the fuck are they doing in Hague?
@Strandjunker To establish an order of succession following the JFK assassination.
Talk of removing Trump under 25A misunderstands what it's for and how it works. It has a mechanism for the VP to take over if POTUS is in a coma (& for POTUS to reassume power if he wakes up), but it's not for removing a POTUS who's dangerously incompetent. That's what impeachment is for.
25A removal is a higher threshold than impeachment. If 2/3 of the House supported removal, why wouldn't they just impeach?
@Strandjunker Another proof that he lost his marbels.
I am missing the times when politicians thought before acting and the speak in clearly structured sentences ("But Obama wore a tan suit!" ... As did Reagan.
When does this nightmare end?