You did it! 🥳

European Parliament just decided that Chat Control 1.0 must stop.

This means on April 6, 2026, Gmail, LinkedIn, Microsoft and other Big Techs must stop scanning your private messages in the EU. #PrivacyWins 💪

Check the decision of your MP by our friends at @HowTheyVoteEU https://howtheyvote.eu/votes/189270

Here's the story of HowTheyVoteEU & why they use Tuta: https://tuta.com/blog/open-source-spotlight-howtheyvoteeu

Vote results: Extension of the temporary derogation from the ePrivacy Directive to combat online child sexual abuse

Find out how the Members of the European Parliament voted.

HowTheyVote.eu

@Tutanota @HowTheyVoteEU Oh, WOW!

¡Muchas gracias, Maravillas!

(se llama así la muy jefa: Maravillas Abadía Jover. Y es pepera: aplauso extra).

https://howtheyvote.eu/members/257043

Maravillas ABADÍA JOVER ・ Member of the European Parliament

Find out how they vote in the European Parliament.

HowTheyVote.eu
@Tutanota @HowTheyVoteEU The numbers here are completely different, can you help me understand this?
@aetios @Tutanota The link I posted was the final vote in plenary, that ultimately failed. The screenshot above is from the vote on Amendment 34, which you can find on our site under the amendment section of the final vote. Hope this clarifies things 🤗
@HowTheyVoteEU @Tutanota Thank you, that helps a bunch! Despite following EU politics for several years already, I still get lost now and then!
@HowTheyVoteEU @aetios @Tutanota Another question: Where do you get the title for a proposition from? I couldn't find it on the europarl website, and I thought it is pretty strange to add the purpose of a proposal (here: to "combat online child sexual abuse") in the title.

@lumiukko Great question! It’s the official title of the legislative procedure the vote belongs to: https://oeil.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/procedure-file?reference=2025/0429(COD)

We use that as a fall-back, until all data from Parliament has been uploaded. This is also why you might see this changing at some point.

We don’t editorialize titles or hand-pick them.

@HowTheyVoteEU @aetios @Tutanota

Looks like you need to find the "Amendments" section at top of [1] to find Amendment 34 (Am 34) [2], which passed by 307 vs 306. IIUC, Am 34 put strong restrictions requiring specific justification to justify spying, and forbidding spying that bypasses E2EE.

IIUC, if the vote on the overall Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 had passed, then thanks to Am 34, the regulation would have hypothetically been weakened.

[1] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-10-2026-0040_EN.html
[2] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-10-2026-0040-AM-004-006_EN.pdf

REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application | A10-0040/2026 | European Parliament

REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application (COM(2025)0797 - C10-0370/2025 - 2025/0429(COD)) Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Rapporteur: Birgit Sippel

@aetios @HowTheyVoteEU @Tutanota The source of the image?
European Parliament decided that Chat Control 1.0 must stop | Hacker News

@Tutanota @HowTheyVoteEU it’s good but i don’t know why people that represents my country in 70% has voted to push it. I hate polish goverment

@invisibleghost777 @Tutanota @HowTheyVoteEU what can I say? Amongst the Italian MEPs, the only ones who voted against it were the communists and the Lega, which is a party literally founded on racism as an ideology. WTF!

ALL the members of the Democratic Party voted in favour. I repeat myself, WTAF!!!

@paraw @invisibleghost777 @Tutanota @HowTheyVoteEU

Many well intentioned but profoundly naive people voted in favour thinking doing so would help protect children from child pornography /creators and disseminators of same.

The idea that ANY content an authoritarian govt wanted to track or inhibit sharing of could be targeted was rejected, likewise the idea that govts would abuse the capabilities (*despite Europe's history*). Because safeguards always work. 🙄

@Tutanota @HowTheyVoteEU
Je remarque : beaucoup d'élus français ont voté pour 🤬
Étonnament, Knafo s'est abstenue.
Glucksmann n'a pas voté 🙄
Morano a voté contre 🤔
@gboussard @Tutanota @HowTheyVoteEU Ça m’étonne aussi, tellement c’est taillé par et pour eux, mais il semblerait que les fascistes soient contre ce truc (comme en Italie). Peut-être parce qu’ils auraient pigé que ça s’appliquerait AUSSI à eux (et ce serait donc pour ça que ça ne cesse d’être repoussé à chaque fois que ça revient sur la table), cet espionnage généralisé ? 🤔
@Tutanota Pretty sure that first link is a different case
@Tutanota Either that or the numbers in the first pic are wrong

@weirdmustard Yes, there were two votes, sorry we got that mixed up when posting. Please check here for a detailed explanation of what happened:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47529646

And here: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/end-of-chat-control-eu-parliament-stops-mass-surveillance-in-voting-thriller-paving-the-way-for-genuine-child-protection/

European Parliament decided that Chat Control 1.0 must stop | Hacker News

@Tutanota @HowTheyVoteEU
I imagine it would be complicated, but it would be really useful to have a list of elected representatives who didn't vote like most of their party.
@Tutanota @HowTheyVoteEU Claire Fita (Occitanie, France) voted for the extension, and she belongs to the "Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats". What's the problem? I'll let you find the link between this vote and progressivism, or socialism, or even democracy... I don't think there is one.