So yeah, @arstechnica confirms the Benj Edwards and Kyle Orland piece with the fabricated quotes* was AI slop and retracted. Doesn't really explain what happened, but Aurich did initially say not to expect a response until after the weekend, so maybe a more fulsome response will follow. Certainly seems like they should explain how it came about, what they're doing to prevent it happening again, and whether other articles were affected

https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/02/editors-note-retraction-of-article-containing-fabricated-quotations/

* https://theshamblog.com/an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-me-part-2/

RE: https://mstdn.social/@dazfuller/116080728819432902

Today's #AIIsGoingGreat … or should I say Al iz gong grate?

https://mastodon.social/@dazfuller@mstdn.social/116080728964221553

Also, the bottom of that Microsoft learn page has an "AI Disclaimer" link in the footer, which says, among other things "We're transparent about articles that contain AI-generated content. All articles that contain any AI-generated content include text acknowledging the role of AI. You'll see this text at the end of the article"

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/principles-for-ai-generated-content

RE: https://infosec.exchange/@josephcox/116086679934852156

#AIIsGoingGreat "Despite thoroughly documenting the AI-generated errors in its lesson plans, Alpha School relies on AI to test the quality of its AI-generated lessons, creating a situation where a faulty AI is tasked with fixing its own faulty generations" https://mastodon.social/@josephcox@infosec.exchange/116086680010329307

RE: https://flipboard.social/@newsguyusa/116092087598905246

Periodic reminder that when an LLM "explains" why it produced some nonsense, the "explanation" is just an explanation shaped thing, without any particular insight into the actual workings of the model

https://mastodon.social/@newsguyusa@flipboard.social/116092088111798499

"If you don't adopt AI, you'll be left behind!" - specifically, your confidential data may be left behind, on your premises, where it belongs.

Also funny coincidence*, EU just banned** a bunch of AI shit from their IT systems for pretty much this reason

https://mastodon.social/@zackwhittaker/116092191816673310
* or "coincidence" 😉
** https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-parliament-blocks-ai-features-over-cyber-privacy-fears/

#AIIsgoingGreat "This AI agent ran within a GitHub Actions workflow and ran with broad privileges. You might be able to guess where this is heading…"
oooh I got this… AGI? The Singularity? To the store for ice cream?

https://adnanthekhan.com/posts/clinejection/

Also: The #AI workflow was added to "automate first-response to reduce maintainer burden"

One might ask the maintainers how the burden of dealing with this shitshow compares with triaging issues

https://adnanthekhan.com/posts/clinejection/

"Amazon said it was a coincidence that AI tools were involved in the outages, and that there was no evidence that such technology led to more errors than human engineers. “In both instances, this was user error, not AI error,” it said" - Ah yes, the engineers probably prompted it wrong

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/feb/20/amazon-cloud-outages-ai-tools-amazon-web-services-aws

Original FT story (via @arstechnica, sans paywall) states "In these two cases, the engineers involved did not require a second person’s approval before making changes, as would normally be the case" and quotes Amazon saying it was "a user access control issue, not an AI autonomy issue" because the engineer involved had "broader permissions than expected" 🤨
Lot of different scenarios could be read between the lines there

https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/an-ai-coding-bot-took-down-amazon-web-services/

RE: https://infosec.exchange/@josephcox/116120627475419783

Today's #AIIsGoingGreat aligns perfectly with expectations https://mastodon.social/@josephcox@infosec.exchange/116120627585647890

"Anthropic said the jailbreaking technique used in the Stanford and Yale research was impractical for normal users and would require more effort to extract the text than just purchasing the content" - Ah yes, the old "it's not infringement because I stored it in an inconvenient format" defense, just like my punch-card MP3 collection

https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/ais-can-generate-near-verbatim-copies-of-novels-from-training-data/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

RE: https://vmst.io/@jalefkowit/116162471325793098

Turns out, you can lose your job to AI https://mastodon.social/@jalefkowit@vmst.io/116162471447876131

#AIIsGoingGreat 'An AP reporter followed prompts for Spanish-language options and was met with a voice speaking accented English that used Spanish only for numbers. “Your estimated wait time is less than ‘tres’ minutes,” the voice said' - Of course, the real problem isn't so much the AI system per se, but the fact such a monumental screwup made it to production and went unfixed for months

https://apnews.com/article/washington-dol-spanish-accent-ai-3a1b8438a5674c07242a8d48c057d5a3

I am less concerned over alleged violations of Anthropic's TOS or Trump's retaliatory ban and more concerned the DOD is reportedly using spicy autocomplete for "intelligence purposes, as well as to help select targets"

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/01/claude-anthropic-iran-strikes-us-military

Fedi nerds (including yours truly): I wouldn't let that slop anywhere near my hobby open source project

DOD: As planning for a potential strike in Iran was underway, Maven, powered by Claude, suggested hundreds of targets, issued precise location coordinates, and prioritized those targets according to importance … The AI tools also evaluate a strike after it is initiated
😬

https://wapo.st/4rcM6dC
(email walled)

#GiftArticle #GiftLink #AIIsGoingGreat

Three years into the AI hype wave, it keeps happening:
1) AI vendor tries to make BS machine look more reliable by having it link sources
2) BS machine BSes the sources
"…its “sources” linked to spammy copies of legit websites, or other archived copies that aren’t the actual source page. Some sources even went to completely unrelated links that weren’t written by the person whose work they were supposedly an example of"

https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/890921/grammarly-ai-expert-reviews

With a little help from a Ouija board, even the dead ones can opt out, I suppose. I mean, it's as much their voice as the Grammarly version

https://mastodon.social/@caseynewton/116201968304541983

"you can create a DLP policy to help protect against the use of sensitive information types (SIT), such as credit card numbers, passport identification, or social security numbers in Microsoft Copilot 365 prompts" - So hypothetically, if one were to include random but formally valid SSN or CC values hidden in your emails or documents, would it stop users of this feature from using their microslop on it? 🤔

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/dlp-microsoft365-copilot-location-learn-about

In today's #AIIsGoingGreat (ht @platypus*), Microsoft security does a nice writeup of SEO bros abusing "summarize with AI" buttons to inject "memories" into AI assistants… and then goes on to offer mitigations like "be sure to hover links before you click them" and "regularly check your AI memories" … because if the last 30 years of infosec has taught us anything, it's that user vigilance is the first and best line of defense, right?

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2026/02/10/ai-recommendation-poisoning/

* https://glammr.us/@platypus/116206592321083176

Bonus #AIIsGoingGreat: After assuring us recent incidents were only coincidentally connected to AI*, Amazon "summoned a large group of engineers to a meeting on Tuesday for a “deep dive” into a spate of outages, including incidents tied to the use of AI coding tools"

https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/03/after-outages-amazon-to-make-senior-engineers-sign-off-on-ai-assisted-changes/

* https://mastodon.social/@reedmideke/116107554568232236

RE: https://mstdn.social/@rysiek/116211625230754185

Not that humans are immune to screwing up TZ/DST logic of course, but I feel like the odds the offending logic was Claude vomit are pretty high, and the fact the RFO doesn't address this is pretty telling

Also this is a good illustration of why the "buT It WRiTes WorKInG CodE" argument is fairly unpersuasive on its own

https://mastodon.social/@rysiek@mstdn.social/116211625348719630

LOL. But will there be any reflection on how it got this far? Did no one stand up and point out the many obvious reasons was likely to be a total shit-show, or were they ignored?

https://mastodon.social/@verge/116212039751696511

I mean, one of their examples is "where is the closest public bathroom that isn’t completely disgusting" and what are the odds Google's LLM has accurate, up to date information about this? (and if, in fact, google does have realtime surveillance of public restrooms, I may have a privacy-related followup)

https://www.theverge.com/tech/893262/google-maps-gemini-ai-ask-maps-immersive-navigation

RE: https://mathstodon.xyz/@mjd/116224397839379268

This will be an interesting test of the AI companies fine print "don't use this great amazing world transforming genius machine for anything serious, lol" disclaimer.

My totally uneducated IANAL guess is OpenAI will win, if they don't settle to make it all go away. As much as the disclaimers are obvious CYA, OpenAI hasn't (AFAIK) explicitly promoted it ChatGPT for litigation

https://mastodon.social/@mjd@mathstodon.xyz/116224398083939471

Original pro se case https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69634076/dela-torre-v-nippon-life-insurance-company-of-america/ which as far as I can tell seems to have effectively ended with the plaintiff agreeing to arbitration and not being sanctioned into oblivion

Case against OpenAI
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72365583/nippon-life-insurance-company-of-america-v-openai-foundation/

RE: https://infosec.exchange/@josephcox/116256386324754543

Shot: "Kantor told 404 Media that artificial intelligence is writing more than half the app’s code these days"
Chaser:
https://mastodon.social/@josephcox@infosec.exchange/116256386410352613

I do wonder though, does anyone involved actually want it or think it will work, or does it exist purely for management have have an ✨AI story?

https://www.404media.co/tinder-plans-to-let-ai-scan-your-camera-roll/

"The leak, which Meta confirmed, happened when an employee asked for guidance on an engineering problem on an internal forum. An AI agent responded with a solution, which the employee implemented – causing a large amount of sensitive user and company data to be exposed to its engineers for two hours" - I would like to see a description of what happened not filtered through generalist press…

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/20/meta-ai-agents-instruction-causes-large-sensitive-data-leak-to-employees

#AI takes another journalism job: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/20/mediahuis-suspends-senior-journalist-over-ai-generated-quotes

#AIIsGoingGreat

🤔 #AGI… Artificial Gross Incompetence? Another Grift Industry? A Giant Inferno?

https://mastodon.social/@verge/116280223405555087

RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@brucelawson/116279073027746358

Today's #AIIsGoingGreat
https://mastodon.social/@brucelawson@vivaldi.net/116279074093149732

Grammarly dude is very quick to say their "expert review" impersonation feature was a bad feature created by a small team that he wasn't involved with and how they already killed before the lawsuit was filed, but very much less to keen to concede that attributing slop to people without permission or compensation is just a shitty thing to do

https://www.theverge.com/podcast/898715/superhuman-grammarly-expert-review-shishir-mehrotra-interview-ai-impersonation

Who decided to (mis)appropriate CQ from hams when "Slop Overflow" was right there?!

(reposting in the correct thread)

https://mastodon.social/@MozillaAI/116279201448628866

So I thought this was SBU trolling, given the very strong indications Ukrainian drones *have* gone through Belarusian airspace in the attacks mentioned, but on closer inspection, it appears Google decided to translate "ДПСУ" as "State Border Guard Service of the Republic of Belarus" 😬 . Oddly, translating just the paragraph gets it right. This seems like a very #LLM-y failure mode

#AIIsGoingGreat