Patrick Breyer🇩🇪US-Konzerne & Lobby-NGOs wollen unsere Chats scannen! 🛑 MORGEN (Tagesordnung) können wir die #Chatkontrolle endgültig killen!
📧 Mails gehen unter.
📞 ANRUFE wirken!
Stoppt die Lobby, ruft JETZT Abgeordnete an: https://fightchatcontrol.de
🇪🇺US tech corps & lobby NGOs want to scan our chats! 🛑 TOMORROW (agenda vote) we can kill #ChatControl for good!
📧 Emails are ignored.
📞 CALLS work!
Stop the lobby, call your MEPs NOW: https://fightchatcontrol.eu
🇫🇷Les géants de la tech US & les lobbys veulent scanner nos messages ! 🛑 DEMAIN (vote de l'ordre du jour), nous pouvons tuer #ChatControl pour de bon !
Stoppez les lobbys, appelez vos eurodéputés MAINTENANT : https://fightchatcontrol.eu
🇮🇹Le Big Tech USA e le lobby vogliono scansionare le nostre chat! 🛑 DOMANI (voto sull'ordine del giorno) possiamo affossare il #ChatControl per sempre!
Fermate le lobby, chiamate i vostri eurodeputati ORA: https://fightchatcontrol.eu
Wietze Brandsma 🏴☠️@echo_pbreyer 🇳🇱Amerikaanse Big Tech en lobby-ngo’s willen onze chats doorzoeken! 🛑 MORGEN (agenda) kunnen we #chatcontrol voorgoed een halt toeroepen!
📧 E-mails gaan verloren.
📞TELEFOONTJES werken!
Stop de lobby, bel NU je Europarlementariërs: https://fightchatcontrol.de
Benoît B.> « nous pouvons tuer #ChatControl pour de bon ! »
Pour de bon ?
Combien de fois les lobbies ont-ils réussi à faire présenter le +/- même texte ?
Digol@benoitb @echo_pbreyer Il fait référence à Chat Control 1.0, s'il est rejeté maintenant, ils ne vous donneront pas le temps de le renouveler avant la fin du délai. Si Chat Control 1.0 se termine, il sera plus difficile d'analyser en masse le texte final, alors appelez les députés si possible
Marcel-Jan Krijgsman@echo_pbreyer Question: should you also call your MEPs if your country already votes against #chatcontrol ? Should you only call your country’s MEPs?
@MarcelJan @echo_pbreyer I think you should also call them if your country is against chat control, the MEPs could have a different stance on the topic and if you can the MEPs from other countries also I think it would be nice
@Digol @echo_pbreyer I just started to call some of the MEPs who are for Chatcontrol (and should know better). Not everyone is available, but I got in contact with the office of one of the Renew Europe members. They are really interested in my view on things. (With my IT security background)
@MarcelJan @echo_pbreyer oh, that's good! Good luck!
ꓤɔᴉʇɐʇS@echo_pbreyer Reading the last paragraph in your article makes me think a lot about fire safety.
We don't do fire safety by continuing to build every building out of plywood and putting smoke detectors everywhere, we do it by not building our houses, furniture and stuff out of easily flammable material so fires are less likely to happen in the first place and if one still does break out, it won't destroy as much.
Online safety must be done with a similar approach.
@echo_pbreyer Not to mention the fact that reporting is always AFTER the incident. Even if done automatically and instantaneously.
A city of plywood and smoke alarms everywhere will always burn to the ground eventually because the firefighters were not able to respond fast enough one time. A city made of bricks can never do that.
@echo_pbreyer In short:
Building an environment that is fundamentally safe by design will always be more safe and reliable than continuously policing an environment that is fundamentally unsafe.
Peter H. Fröhlich@echo_pbreyer Endgültig? ENDGÜLTIG? Hast du was geraucht weil ich will das bitte auch rauchen...
Lord Caramac the Clueless, KSC@echo_pbreyer Endgültig killen läßt die sich nicht, nur für diese Runde. In spätestens fünf Jahren kommt der nächste Anlauf. Das ist ein ewiger Kampf, bei dem wir jedesmal gewinnen müssen, denn wenn wir nur einmal verlieren, war es das.