My #Wikipedia request for comment just closed, finally banning #AI content in articles! "The use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited"
Kudos to all who participated in writing the guideline (especially Kowal2701) and the whole WikiProject AI Cleanup team, this was very much a group effort!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Writing_articles_with_large_language_models/RfC
@quarknova will do!
The vote is in two weeks, and I'm doing all I can to gather support for AI opposition with the petition I created.
Thank you for support!
@indutny Also, isn't there a huge issue around GenAI'd content not being able to be copyrighted in the first place? And if not copyrightable, how could it even be submitted under an open source license?
or
https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/LSB/PDF/LSB10922/LSB10922.8.pdf
"Similar to the AI Guidance’s emphasis on “creative control,” the report concludes that,
“given current generally available technology, prompts alone do not provide sufficient human control to
make users of an AI system the authors of the output.” The report contends that the Copyright Act’s
distinction between copyrightable “works” and noncopyrightable “ideas” precludes copyrightability for
works generated by AI in response to user prompts."
This is what started the discussion on that PR! Developer's Certificate of Origin of Node.js loosely says that the author is the author of the code, or knows where they got the code from and under what license.
With AI - generated code is neither!
chaotic enby
Fedor Indutny
Dobviews
Anyia, geeky 🏳️⚧️ girl