i dont know! i agree it would be a useful feature, ive wanted it too. i saw this asked of admin the other day but dont remember the outcome.
for 1 - i cant interact with those posts (because i…dont have a bsky…? nothing to link? (im new to the fediverse and dont rly understand))
for 2 - i would hope wafrn is for developing a wafrn-specific culture distinct from bsky, in the same way tumblr-specific culture is distinct from twitter (and often directly oppositional)…not just talking about mechanics of how posts are shared and interacted with but the content and flavor and style of content too.
like, its nice they can be crossposted smoothly ig, its just. i dont have many actives i want to follow yet, but i do want to get a taste of wafrn posting, so i frequent the explore feed, but then the explore feed is inundated with bsky and not wafrn.
There is an option in settings butt it still fails on some cases where it’s not so cut and dry and requires calculations that are ok when you write a post or like, but is not viable to do it for every post you see on the dashboard
It would be better is this option, when we have it, is done on the frontend
they shouldn't appear if you have bsky disabled with two exceptions:
boosts are easy to deal with and we'll get to it, quotes is a tiny bit more difficult
the issue is tracked here if you wanna keep up: https://codeberg.org/wafrn/wafrn/issues/592

When we implemented #497, gabbo remarked that there's more work needed to fully hide bluesky posts, the two most obvious ones are: - quotes of bsky posts - rewoots of bsky posts Rewoots are easy, just hide them, but quotes are a bit more nuanced: Should we still display the post at all, wh...