This cannot be:

I am trying to compile a few stats for the #Snakemake executor plugin for #SLURM on #HPC systems. Preparing for a lighting talk at the #SnakemakeHackathon2026

PyPi: 20,000 downloads last month
BioConda: > 60,000 total (aggregated over all versions)

Impressive as it might be, this is contradictory. PyPi would exceed BioConda by a huge margin.

Does anyone know how to get all-time statistics from either platform? #BioConda or #PyPi?

@rupdecat are you sure pypi would predominate? What makes you think that. We would prefer conda if the package is available on conda but others may differ I guess. Do you see a similar split for snakemake itself?

@jaymoore

One month of PyPi making up a 3rd of all BioConda deployments. I would be a bad statistician, if I would simply believe that. It is, of course, possible.

As we recommend installing Snakemake via Conda (or use it via #easybuild or #spack) and installation via pip is rather difficult for all dependencies, I don't think the comparison will make much sense. (PyPi is about 8x compared to the plugin, BioConda > 1e6 in total). The real issue is that these numbers (total vs. monthly as a maximum) aren't really comparable in the first place. Hence, my rather generic question (or perhaps there is an API).

(But seriously: It is not worth investing too much time for this.)

@rupdecat @jaymoore I would strongly suspect either some web scraping shennigans or some "agentic AI" slopware having gone on weird tangeant...

BTW: wishing you a nice hackathon! Too bad I couldn't join this year. Hopefully next time?