The reason is that alt text is scraped in order to train multimodal text + image models.
But for anyone who actually listens to the blind community, it doesn't take long to learn that these models are pretty important to a lot of people for accessibility. And regardless, alt text is directly helpful. I'm happy to put my displeasure with big tech on hold for things that genuinely improve people's lives.
Maybe, IDK. It depends on what they're training the model for, and how they're using it. But do we really want to make it unusable for training the model, when those models are then used for accessibility as well?
@dilmandila
I think alt text should focus on what you want to communicate with the image, not some "objective" description of what's in it.
I like it when people do that even though I'm seeing, sometimes it helps me when I find it cryptic why people posted the image.
@hosford42 @ChristineMalec @ClimateJenny
@dilmandila @hosford42 @ChristineMalec @ClimateJenny
Another approach would be to write clear, descriptive alt text but use something like Nightshade to poison your image so that "AI" can't make sense of it:
I still think that's working against the public good. If the models being trained on this data are used for accessibility by the blind community, and we are intentionally working to lower their accuracy, we are hurting the blind community. We should fight the AI vendors on a front where there aren't innocent bystanders who will be hit.
@hosford42 @CppGuy @dilmandila @ChristineMalec @ClimateJenny
You've hit the nail on the head here.
When we fight big tech, which we should, we shouldn't be fighting to destroy accessibility. like you said, it hurts innocent bystanders.
People often don't realize what IS accessibility, and so I wrote a zine to break it down and try to teach folks, so they don't do harmful stuff like poisoning datasets used specifically for improving accessibility. https://reshapingreality.org/2025/06/17/accessibility-zine-completed-and-ready-for-download/
Sure, that's poisoning the image itself, not for the purpose of ruining models that could generate alt text, but ruining models that could generate othe images of the same style. I say go for it.
@hosford42 Is there a way to do one but not the other, though? Do alt text-generating models and generative diffusion models use different datasets or get their data differently? 🤔 Ideally there would be NO non-consensual scraping of any websites, and models that purport to have pro-social uses shouldn't be resorting to it.
I think the core problem here is that the laws need to catch up to the reality -- and be enforced, too. Someday we will live in a world where we each have irrevocable ownership of our own data, and can choose to donate it all or in part to those causes we deem just. I have no idea how long it will take us to get there, though. Probably not our lifetimes, from the look of it.
This is how far you'd have to go to actually stop it from happening. Or at least you can't post *publicly* without it happening.
This is not to say that it's right for that to be the case, or that it's the individual's responsibility to curb bad behavior from these corporations. We need laws for that. But if people are going to take it upon themselves to disrupt this behavior, picking on alt text in particular is severely misguided.
The insatiable maw of the Moloch slurps up everything on the internet. All the public posts on Mastodon included.
@ClimateJenny but it is obvious, that ALT texts can and will be used for training AI... there is no way we can prevent this, especially when the content is accessible without any logins.
@raphaelmorgan the rest of statuses cannot be compared for meaning with anything else. On the contrary: the ALT texts for images, entered as best effort to help visually challenged users, can be trusted for AI training on the content of the images
I don't say I don't add ALT text because of that, but the dual use was obvious from the very beginning (at the same time, already 2 years ago, some people were using AI to generate the ALT text, which is maybe not, how it was intended, in the first place?)
The situation is, that we are using certain users, who are just lazy to add ALT text to all they upload. The content may be not worth it, in some cases. I really don't have any idea, how the online social interaction of blind people feels like. I don't want to disrupt it. The network may feel more inclusive, if there are more ALT texts.
On the other hand, some people may feel discouraged to upload more photographs because they don't feel like describing it all by words. Sometimes my descriptions just feel boring. Sometimes it is just about feeling, which can't be described by words. I am sorry for those, who can't receive the visual message, but somehow I don't feel image can be always summarized by words and I am not sure it is worth pretending it can be... so my feelings about usefulness of ALT text are somehow mixed.
The AI training issue will have to be addressed in some other way, then spamming ALT texts with complaints. But at least empty ALT text is more honest, than AI generated summary? I am not sure...
@ChristineMalec just time, nothing else. Sorry, more then 5 words:
I use my account as my microblog. I go to mountains. I want to upload all photos for my friends. I just don't have time to write all ALT tags to all images from my cell phone. After all - all ALT texts are same (I sometimes copy + paste them).
I don't really do this to get as many boosts as possible: I do this for my followers and I hope my friends to do the same, I like to share images from where we travel. But I don't always have time to write ALT tags for eg. all 12 images in 3 statuses, but I still want to share them (it is backup), I hate AI (on the other hand, anyone can use AI to generate ALT text).
What I usually do is to write ALT text for the first (best) image in the thread and then I add more image-only statuses, with short or none ALT text. For time reasons. I am outdoor and don't have time to write eg. 12 ALT texts.
On the other hand, I would appreciate if more people used hashtags, but I don't run any "please use hashtags" campaign (I did, 3 years ago, but people hated it).
@ClimateJenny Easy — abuse of genAI has done, and been blamed for without doing, so much damage to the society in the past few years that it has become a sort of folk devil. If you see an evil thing done, and assume it has something to do with genAI, you'll have a pretty good chance of getting it right.
Some people just ... hallucinate ... up evil things where they aren't, though, and then ascribe those hallucinations to genAI. Full circles can be so karmic!
#AI to improve #accessibility and supporting those with #disabilities is unquestionably one of the few valid use cases that can and will directly and meaningfully improve people's lives. Yet, it's being used for chatbots and weird pictures and videos.
Make it make sense.
I'm sure it's scraped even from here. But that doesn't negate the actual purpose of alt text for real human beings. These folks need to take 2 seconds to think through the consequences of their decisions.
@ChristineMalec Wow, what an asshole!
I once had someone go off on me on here and bitching at me for supposedly policing what they posted simply because I boosted something saying about being sure to add alt text.🙄
@ChristineMalec wow rude of them??? rude of them. alt text is NOT where anyone should make a little stand abt why they dislike alt text. alt txt is a core piece of web code and design we've abandoned carelessly as things got faster - forgetting its true purpose.
idk how anyone can resent it. like resenting curb cuts by claiming they make it easier for cars to drive on the sidewalk. like i mean I GUESS but how often is that HAPPENING and more importantly how many ppl who are using walkers or wheels would be negatively impacted without it??
seethe righteously bc youre right